Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  232 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 232 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

Eternal India

encyclopedia

HYDER AND TIPPU

1722-1799 A.D.

LURE - THRU THE AGES

Foes

:

English, The Ma-

rathas, Nawab of Carnatic,

Rulers of Coorg and Cannan-

Overview

*

Mysore under Hyder Ali and Tippu Sul-

tan was a source of danger to the rising

British power in India during the second

half of the 18th C.

*

Though Hyder Ali was not educated he

became a great military leader.

*

His son, Tippu Sultan, called

"Tiger of

Mysore

" became the most powerful en-

emy of the English East India Company.

*

Tippu died fighting valiantly against the

British in the Fourth Mysore War.

Advent

Decline in the rule of the Mysore rulers.

*

Hyder Ali having displayed great ability

as a commander of horse, rose to the rank

of Faujdar, and in 1761 he usurped all

power in the state and seized the fortress

of Bednore with immense treasures.

Chronology

*

Hyder Ali (1722-1782)

*

Tippu Sultan (son of Hyder

Ali)

(1750-99)

Wars

1767-69 First Mysore War. Hyder Ali defeated

the English.

1769-72 The Maratha-Mysore War; Marathas

defeated Hyder Ali.

1780-84 Second Mysore War; Tippu Sultan

took over after the death of Hyder

Ali in 1782. Treaty of Mangalore in

1784 ends war.

1790-92 Third Mysore War. Tippu defeated;

Treaty of Seringapatam signed in

1792.

1799 Fourth Mysore War; Tippu was de-

feated and killed by English.

Tippu Sultan

1750-1799

Tippu was bom on November 10,1750 at

Devanahalli to Fatima and Hyder Ali. He

was affectionate in nature; possessed great

personal courage; calm and calculating he

did not possess an impetuous temper; very

ambitious. He had a cultured mind; he was

greatly interested in sufism, and under his pa-

tronage a number of books were written; he

was greatly interested in calligraphy; he wrote

a book on astrology named

Zabarjad

; he was

a patron of music and had great fondness for

architecture.

Friends

: French.

Administration

*

His government, though

strict and arbitrary, was

the despotism of a politic

and able sovereign.

*

He was the supreme

legislative, judicial and executive authority

in his kingdom; he was his own foreign

minister and commander-in-chief.

*

His government, called

Sarkar-i-Khuda-

dad

(Government given by God), was

highly, centralised with seven principal

cutchehries

(departments).

*

He abolished the custom of giving

jagirs

to his officers.

*

He was against the retention of

poligars..

He tried to trade with foreign countries by

establishing factories.

Strengths

*

He had a high sense of duty to his office;

he spared no pains to promote the welfare

of his people; his personal valour, fear-

lessness and perseverance inspired his

troops with confidence and enthusiasm.

Achievements

*

In 1797 he constructed a dam across the

Cauvery with an embankment seventy

feet high few miles west of Seringapatam.

Developed agriculture, promoted trade

and industry, built roads, confiscated un-

authorised grants and eliminated

poli-

gars..

He was the pioneer of road build-

ing in Malabar.

Weakness

*

Tippu's ideas were good but he could not

put all of them into practice.

*

He hated the English and could not came

to a compromise with them. He pinned all

his hopes on the French.

Decline

*

With the fall of Srirangapatam in the

Fourth Mysore War after the death of

Tippu, the kingdom was at the mercy of

the English. Though they had captured

only the capital and some other minor

forts, a large part of Mysore, including

important forts like Chitradurga and Sira

were still in the possession of the Mysore-

ans.

But after the death of the Sultan there was

no will to resistance left. The principal

officers formally surrendered to the Brit-

ish.

Tippu's second son Abdul Khaliq also

surrendered. Fath Haidar, Tippu's eldest

son, continued his struggle for a short du-

ration before he also surrendered to the

English.

After the surrender of Tippu's sons and

officers Wellesley could have annexed

the entire Kingdom of Mysore, but he left

the central part of the kingdom to the de-

scendants of the old ruling family of

Mysore.

The bulk of what was left was divided be-

tween the Company and the Nizam of

Hyderabad, and a small portion was of-