FREEDOM MOVEMENT
Eternal India
encyclopedia
The effect of the Swadeshi movement
was remarkable as is evident from this
'States-
man'
chart showing comparative sales of
foreign textiles:
Place
Textile
sold
Sept. 1904
Textile
sold
Sept. 1905
Jassore
Nadia
Hazariabagh
Rs. 30,000
15,000
10,000
Rs22Rs. 2,000
2,500
500
The report also showed a gradual fall in
the demand for foreign cigarettes, soap,
perfumes, etc.
The boycott and Swadeshi movement
turned into an All India Movement before the
close of 1905; by this time it had spread to
23 districts (UP), 15 towns (MP), 24 towns
(of Bombay) 20 districts (of Punjab) and 13
districts (of Madras); the leaders of the
movement were Bal Gangadhar (Bombay),
Subrahmanya Aiyer and T. M. Nayar (Ma-
dras); They declared,
"This is the weapon of a
weak nation in a fight against a strong na-
tion”.
Thus the ideas of Boycott and Swadeshi
were brought about by the repressive meas-
ures which were adopted by the Government
to put down the Boycott movement, formally
inaugurated on 7 August, 1905, a red-letter
day in the annals of the struggle for India's
freedom.
"The agitation for boycott of Brit-
ish goods and the use of indigenous
products acquired a wider connota-
tion and influence in national life and
thought by transcending narrow eco-
nomic considerations. So the thin
stream of 1905, gradually widened
into a mighty river of struggle for
freedom to pour its waters into the sea
of independence. New streams poured
their water into the river between 1905
and 1947.... but the flow released by
the anti-partition movement from the
mountain peak, in its journey to the
goal was never hindered".
-R.C.M.
LAL, BAL, PAL
Lala Lajpat Rai, Bala Gangadhar Tilak
and Bipin Chandra Pal: popularly known as
“Lai, Bal, Pal’’
became the prominent trio-
leaders of the Indian Freedom Struggle.
Lala Lajpat Rai (1865-1928)
Lala Lajpat Rai was bom in a small village
of Ludhiana. He was also known as ‘Punjab
Kesari’. He studied law and obtained his degree
in Lahore (1880). He attended the Congress
Session of 1888 at Allahabad. Speaking about
the Indian National Congress he said,
“The
Congress movement was neither inspired by
the people, nor devised or planned by them .lt
was a movement not from within...the leaders
had neither sufficient political
..........
conscious-
ness nor faith....they had political-opinions
but not beliefs... ”
The British treatment of
Indian masses enraged him and he became a
fiery leader. He opposed the exploitation of
the British government. Lajpat Rai advocated
liberty from foreign control. He passionately
exclaimed,
“Can the wealth of the whole world
be put in the states over against liberty and
honour? A subject people has no soul, just as
a slave can have none... a man without a soul
is a mere animal. A nation without a soul is
only a herd of “dumb driven cattle”.
In 1905
he visited England along with Gokhale to
arouse public opinion on injustice done to
Indians. Later he was deported to Burma as a
consequence of his aggressive movement in
Punjab. He was a follower of Gandhi and took
active part in the movement against the Simon
Commission which visited India in 1928; he
took out a procession in Lahore against the
Simon Commission’s visit under Simon but
was lathi charged. He was injured and died of
his injuries shouting,
“Every blow aimed at
me is a nail struck in the coffin of the British
empire in India. ”
Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1856-1920)
Born to a school teacher and deputy in-
spector of education; became an orphan at the
age of 16. A self-reliant but physically weak
youth he studied B.A. and later took law
degree; started a school and two newspapers
to spread Western knowledge; offered his
help to start Deccan Education Society and
Fergusson College; purchased the
Lion,
a
Marathi weekly and renamed it as
Kesari
and
helped to edit its English counterpart,
The
B. G. Tilak
Mahratta;
he gave expression to his idea of
nationalism through
Kesari.
In 1885 he
wrote,
“We are, at present, gradually being
inspired by the spirit of patriotism. The birth
of patriotism among us is due to English rule
and English education has imparted to us
knowledge of ancient and modern history; it
has enabled us to know what were the fruits of
patriotism they became among the ancient
Greeks and Romans. We have also
learned....when they lost their patriotism, they
became subject to foreign domination and
became ignorant and superstitious. English
rule has made us realise the necessity of cul-
tivating patriotism in our national concerns...
Patriotism is not our national quality; it is the
product of the influences to which we have
been subjected after the introduction of the
British rule.”
He started the popular
“
Ganesha
” festival and celebration of Mara-
tha hero Shivaji to awaken the people of India;
The credit of leavening Indian politics with
national spirit belongs to Bal Gangadhar Ti-
lak. He was the first to emphasise the four
distinctive features of the nationalist move-
ment :
1.
Sincere faith in the glory and greatness
of Indian culture.
2.
Rely on own strength and assertion.
3.
Political goals of India —
Swaraj
and
4.
Awakening of political-consciousness
among the people and political-agita-
tion.
Tilak’s role during the terrible Bombay
famine (1896) was dominant; he undertook
the task of educating the people about the
provisions of the
Famine Relief Code
and
boldly demanded the facilities offered by it.
He made stirring appeals to the people;
through
Kesari
he said,
“When the Queen
desires that none should die; when the
Governor declares that all should live, will
you ’’
, he exclaimed
“kill yourself by timidity
and starvation ? If you have money to pay the
government...pay it...But if you have not...Can