Eternal India
encyclopedia
anything is likely to prove to be an underestimate by a thousand
years or so. The last word has not been said.
SELECTED REFERENCES
1.
Datta, B.B. (1993)
Ancient Hindu Geometry
: The Science of the Sulba.
The standard reference on the Sulbas in English.
2.
Seidenberg, A. (1978)
The Origin of Mathematics, in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences,
Vol. 18
A monumental and definitive study establishing the connections between the
Sulbas, Pythagorean Greek, Old-Babylonian and Egyptian mathematics.
3.
Rajaram, N.S. (1994)
INTRODUCTION
The Indians in ancient time recognised two types of knowledge:
Aparavidya
(Inferior knowledge) and
Paravidya
(Superior or Spiri-
tual knowledge). An act of worship done with a specific worldly
desire was considered an inferior form of worship and was popular
with the kings.
Aparavidya
enables man to attain material prog-
ress, enrichment and fulfillment of life and
Paravidya
ensures at-
tainment of self-realization or salvation in life (Chand. Up.7.1.7;
Munda. Up. 1.2.4-5). The Vedic people, in general, made interest-
ing synthesis by adopting
nitya
(perpetual or daily) and
kamya
(optional for wish-fulfillment) sacrifices or offerings. The first was
supposed to bring happiness to the family and second was to give
material progress. The perpetual daily sacred fires and the optional
fires were placed on altars of various shapes. As to the reasons
which might have induced the ancient Indians to devise all these
strange shapes, the
Rigveda
(1.15.12) says, “He who desires
heaven, may construct falcon shaped altar, for falcon is the best
flyer among the birds”. These may appear to be. superstitious
fancies but led to important contributions in geometry and mathe-
matics because of their conviction in social value systems.
The findings for the right time for religious, agricultural, New
Year and other social festivals gave the motivations for recording
of repeated events from seasons, stars, movement of planets,
moon etc. This helped to develop many a framework for mapping of
movements of heavenly bodies with reference to East, West,
North and South points,
nakshatras,
calendar,
yuga, mahayuga
and
movements of planets for mean and true positions of planets.
Various mathematical and trigonometrical tables were also formu-
lated for better and better results. The
Vedanga Jyotisa
mentions
as under:
"Having saluted Time with bent head, as also Goddess
Saraswati, I shall explain the lore of Time, as enunciated by sage
Lagadha. 'As the crests on the head of the peacocks, the jewels on
the serpents, so is the
(jyotisa ganitam
) held at the head of all lores
among all
vedanga sastras'Ganita
is a variant reading for
Jyotisa
meaning computation which is the essence of this science.
Another tradition which has enriched specialized activities in
mathematics
and
astronomy
is
the
guru-sisya-parampara
(teacher-student
tradition).
Different
recensions
of
Vedic
schools,
Sulbakaras, Jyotiskaras
(
Varahamihira
gives names of 20
scholars before him), Kusumpura school, schools of Ujjain and
As-
makadesa,
Jain and Buddhist schools also are well known in this
connection.
Ancient Concepts, Sciences & Systems
Language, mathematics and astronomy: a chronological synthesis for the Vedic
Age, in the
International Journal of Indian Studies,
Special Issue on the Indo-Aryan
Problem. January-June 1994.
A systematic study of the mathematics of the ancient world, with special emphasis
on the history and chronology of Vedic mathematics. Supplies several missing
details in Seidenberg’s study and corrects some errors. It also shows some
possible connections between Egyptian pyramids and Vedic altars going back to
2700 BCE.
4.
Swami Bharati Krishna Tirthaji (1965, 1992)
Vedic mathematics.
Revised edition. Motilal Banarasidass, Delhi.
A fascinating and controversial book with a somewhat misleading title. This
famous monograph contains many interesting resiilts that its author claims are
contained in secret form in the Vedas.
(Dr. N.S.R)
Beside these, there were commercial and other problems which
were tackled for
Lokavyavaharartha,
used for common people. The
restriction and emphasis were also assured on social use and value
systems which helped people to take up different activities for
commerce, education and other areas. These helped undoubtedly to
concretize knowledge resulting in original contributions to mathe-
matics and astronomy.
CONSTRUCTION OF ALTARS, AND NATURE OF
KNOWLEDGE
The ritual connection of Indian geometry, as elaborated by Thi-
baut and Burk, has been intensively discussed by Datta, Seiden-
berg, Sen and Bag, and others. The ceremonies were performed on
the top of altars built either in sacrificer’s house or on a nearby plot
of ground. The altar is a specified raised area, generally made of
bricks for keeping the fire. The fire altars were of two types. The
perpetual fires (
nitya agnis)
were constructed on a smaller area of
one sq.
purusha
and optional fires (
kamya agnis
) were constructed
on a bigger area of 7-1/2 sq
purushas
or more, each having mini-
mum of five layers of bricks. The perpetual fires had 21 bricks and
optional fires had 200 bricks in each layer in the first construction
and the number of bricks became more in the subsequent construc-
tion with other restrictions. For optional fire altars, the whole
family of the organiser had to reside by the construction site of
optional fire altars, for which another class of structure known as
mahavedi
and other related vedis were made. However, a sum-
mary of these types of altars with ground shapes are grouped
below:
a)
Perpetual Fire Altars
(Area coverage: 1 sq. purusha):
Ahava-
niya
(square),
Garhapatya
(circle/square),
Dakshinagni
(semi-
circle).
b)
Optional Fire Altars
(Area coverage: 7-1/2 sq. purusha):
Catu-
rasrasyenacit
(hawk bird with sq. body, sq. wings, sq. tail),
Kankacit
and
Alajacit
(bird with curbed wings and tail)
Prauga
(triangle),
Ubhayata Prauga
(rhombus), •
Ratha-Cakracit
(circle),
Dranacit
(trough),
Smasanacit,
(Isosceles trapezium),
Kurmacit
(tortoise) etc.
c)
Vedis:
Mahavedi
or
Saumiki vedi
(isosceles trapezium)
Sautramani vedi
(isosceles trapezium, and also one-third of the
mahavedi),
Paitriki vedi
(isos., trapezium or a square, area one-
third of Sautramani vedi),
Pragvamsha
(rectangle).
One can guess the nature of knowledge which could originate
from such altar constructions. However, the sulbasutras of
MEDIEVAL MATHEMATICS