Previous Page  119 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 119 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

Although this was its first "decision" on abuse of a

dominant position, the Commission had previously com-

mented on the case of Europ-Emballage, the Dutch

metal-packaging firm taken over by the US firm, Con-

tinental Can.

The Commission restated its doctrine that takeovers

by a dominant firm of a competing firm can in itself

constitute an abuse.

The Commission has investigated all five of the nat-

ional copyright societies in the member states (Luxem-

bourg is covered by the French society) but only

GEMA

refused to change its rules to conform with the

EEC Treaty,

GEMA

has said it would take the case to

the Community Court in Luxembourg.

The Commission decision in no way affects

GEMA'S

cultural or social functions, the copyrights themselves

or the financial incomes of the authors, except in trying

to re-establish the rights of the affiliates

vis-a-vis,

GEMA.

Statutory Instruments

RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (No. 2), 1971

S.I. No. 226 of 1972

1. In Order 76, rule 6 shall be deleted, and the follow-

ing rule substituted therefore :—

"6. All such proceedings (except notices to creditors)

shall be written or printed or partly written and

partly printed on paper on sheets measuring 13

inches by 8 inches or thereabouts, with an inner

margin of If inches wide; but no objection shall

be allowed to any proof of debt, affidavit or proxy

on account of its being written or printed on other

sized paper."

2. In Order 86, rule 18 (3) shall be deleted and the

following sub-rule substituted therefore :—

"(3). A transcript of the shorthand notes taken of

the proceedings at the trial of an appellant

shall be supplied by the Registrar free of

charge

(b) to an appellant who has been granted a

legal aid (appeal) certificate, and

(b) to any other appellant by order of the

Court."

3. The following additional Order shall be inserted

immediately after Order 90 viz :

ORDER 90A

THE REDUNDANCY PAYMENTS ACT, 1967

1. Every appeal to the Court under the Redundancy

Payments Act, 1967 shall be brought by special sum-

mons.

2. The summons shall be entitled in the matter of

the said Act, on the application of the person bring-

ing the appeal, and shall state the decision of the

Redundancy Appeals Tribunal, (hereinafter referred

to as the Tribunal), appealed against and the

grounds of appeal.

3. The summons shall be served on the Minister for

Labour and all parties to the decision of the Tribunal.

4. The summons shall be issued within twenty-one

days of the date on which notice of the decision of

the Tribunal was given to the party appealing; pro-

vided that the time within which the summons may

be issued may be extended on application

ex parte

at any time within six weeks from the date on which

notice of the decision of the Tribunal was given to

the party desirous of appealing.

5. Any question referred to the decision of the High

Court by the said Minister under section 40 of the

said Act shall be brought by special summons, en-

titled in the matter of the said Act, on the applica-

tion of the said Minister. The summons shall state

concisely the question referred for the decision of the

Court and shall be served on all parties to the appli-

cation to the Tribunal.

6. No costs shall be allowed of any proceedings under

this order unless the Court shall by special order

allow such costs."

4. In Order 99, rule 45 shall be deleted and the follow-

ing rule substituted therefore :—

"45. Subject to the provisions of rule 8, in all cases

not provided for by rule 39 in which a person

shall obtain judgment for the payment of money

or costs, if and when execution shall issue on foot

thereof, the officer issuing such execution, shall

add to the sum ordered to be paid the appropri-

ate sum specified in respect of 'costs of execu-

tion' set forth in Appendix W, Part III."

5. These rules shall be construed together with the

Ruls of the Superior Courts and may be cited as

the Rules of the Superior Courts (No. 2), 1971.

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS

S.I. No. 218 of 1971

SOLICITORS ACT 1954 (APPRENTICESHIP AND

EDUCATION) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS

1971

The effect of these Regulations is to enable time spent

by an apprentice in temporary employment outside the

master's office to count as due service provided that it

does not interfere with his employment as an appren-

tice. Consequential amendments have been made to

Form AE5. These Regulations came into force on 15th

July, 1971.

121