Previous Page  130 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 130 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

therefore make an order under Article 40 of the Con-

stitution directing the governor of Portlaoise Prison to

produce Mr. Langan before the President of the High

Court on June 10th and to certify in writing the

grounds of his detention.

He said that when this matter was in the High Court

it appeared that the President was left under the

impression that Mr. Langan had voluntarily discharg-

ed his solicitor. Mr. Langan, said the Chief Justice,

should have a solicitor assigned to bring senior and

junior counsel to argue the matter on his behalf.

The court was unanimous in its decision.

(In re Langan—Supreme Court—unreported—26th

May 1971).

PRESIDENT CRITICAL OF MINISTER S

ACTION IN MEAT RESEARCH UNIT CASE

In a reserved judgment yesterday, the President of the

High Court, Mr. Justice O'Keeffe, dismissed an action

by five meat companies against the Minister for Agri-

culture over a proposal to establish a meat research

unit.

The companies, Premier Meat Packers (Ireland),

Ltd., C.F.U. Meats Ltd., Clover Meats Ltd., Roscrea

Meat Products Ltd., and Edmund Burke and Sons,

Ltd., had sought the return of moneys which they

claimed were collected from them to establish a meat

research unit.

They claimed that a levy was imposed on animals

slaughtered at all registered meat export premises and

bacon factories to finance a meat research unit which

was to be established by the Irish Fresh Meat Export-

ers' Society and the Beef Canners' Advisory Associa-

tion. They said that no such unit was established, nor

was it now intended to establish one.

The Minister, in his defence, claimed that his Depart-

ment and An Foras Taluntais had always been willing

to help in establishing the unit and he denied that

the purpose for which the levies had been collected had

failed, or that he held them in trust for the plaintiffs.

He claimed that the moneys should be disposed of for

the benefit of the Exchequer in such manner as the

Minister for Finance might direct.

Judge's comments

The President, however, made an order declaring

that the statutory instruments 36 and 37 be laid before

the Houses of the Oireachtas and he commented that

he considered that there was an obligation on the Minis-

ter, even at this late stage, to comply with the law by

laying these regulations before each House of the

Oireachtas, so that each House might consider whether

they should be allowed to stand or be annulled by

resolution. Apart from this, he considered that the

plaintiffs were entitled to no relief in the action.

The President continued; "The position taken up by

the Minister may be strictly in accordance with the

statutes, that is to say, that the fees collected from the

traders concerned are to be applied for the benefit of

the Exchequer in such a manner as the Minister for

Finance may direct. In other words, these fees may be

treated as part of the general revenue of the State and

applied for any purpose directed by the Minister for

Finance, regardless of the purpose outlined to the

Dail and Seanad Eireann when resolutions approving

of the draft regulations were passed.

"Reliance on this action seems to me to be a gross

breach of faith on the part of the Minister towards

the traders concerned at whose instance the regulations

were made and the Houses of the Oireachtas who

approved the draft regulations on the basis of the Min-

ister's statements in each House. Nonetheless, it would

seem that these fees, received for a very special pur-

pose, have been applied to other purposes, after being

for a period retained in the suspense account.

Put into revenue

"A strange position arises in regard to these moneys.

They were, as I believe, impressed with a trust that

they should be applied in a particular way and were

collected on the representation that they would be so

applied. Under the relevant legislation, the approval of

Seanad Eireann was required before the increased levies

could be imposed.

"One might think that it would be open to me at this

stage to make a declaration that they are still held on

the trust referred to, but it appears that they have been

put into the general revenue of the State and dealt

with each year under its Appropriation Act, so that by

legislation they have been silently diverted from the

purpose for which they were collected and applied in

other ways.

"I should like to think that when a Minister ignores

a statutory direction of a very express kind as men-

tioned, the result would be that the regulations would

be regarded as null and void

ab initio

, but I do not

think that I should be justified, on the authorities such

as they are, in so holding."

The Irish Independent

(31st July, 1971)

FORMER JUDGE FINED £75 OVER

DEATH CRASH

Lord Hodson, 75, a former Lord of Appeal, was fined

£75 and had his driving licence endorsed at Henley-

on-Thames, Oxon, yesterday after being found guilty

of careless driving immediately before a crash in which

a 20-year-old girl was killed.

M Peter Bickerton, chairman of the magistrates,

said they had decided against disqualification after

taking into account Lord Hondon's "wonderful" driv-

ing record : More than 50 years without an accident

and only one minor previous conviction.

Lord Hodson, of Rotherfield Greys, Oxon, had

denied driving his Austin van carelessly on the Henley-

Oxon road shortly after darkness on February 21.

Mr. Bickerton and two women magistrates also

found him guilty of failing to comply with a "give

way" sign as he joined a main road from a side road,

but they imposed no second penalty.

Miss Sally Billington, a hairdresser of Ealing, died

in "an unusually violent collision" between Lord Hod-

son's car and a Morris Mini driven by her friend

John Carlton, 21.

Mr. Morison, counsel defending said that Lord Hod-

son "very much regretted" the accident. It was a very

great tragedy. But there was another tragedy of a differ-

ent sort in the case—lack of evidence.

The driver of a car which had been overtaken by

Mr. Carlton just before the collision and who must

have been able to assist the court had not come for-

ward despite police appeals. They were sure that the

driver's evidence would have been favourable to Lord

Hodson.

Mr. Carlton said he had no recollection after over-

taking the last of three cars on a dual carriageway. He

had his headlights on and his speed—described by the

132