Previous Page  134 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 134 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

66 Northern Lawyers Oppose

Imprisonment Without Trial

A group of 66 lawyers in Belfast have issued a state-

ment calling for an end to imprisonment without trial

and the restoration of the rule o flaw by way of normal

judicial process.

The lawyers, barristers and solicitors from all over

Northern Ireland, say that internment has been respon-

sible for an escalation of violence rather than a reduc-

tion of it. The lawyers' statement said :

"We wish to express a public protest at the recent

introduction of imprisonment without trial and the

circumstances and manner in which it has been carried

out.

"Internment infringes a person's basic right to liberty

and also infringes the legal principle that a person is

presumed innocent until proved guilty, and for these

reasons is basically repugnant to all lawyers.

"If internment could in any circumstances be justified,

which many lawyers do not accept, it certainly could

not be justified in the recent manner of its imposition.

"Prior to its imposition it was clear that general com-

munity support for it was wanting and events since then

have' tragically corroborated this fact and have also led

to the conclusion that internment has been responsible

for an escalation of violence rather than a reduction.

"Its imposition in an apparently partisan fashion and

the use of methods which have given rise to serious

allegations of brutality are the cause of grave disquiet."

The statement said that the failure of the policy of

internment had been proved by events. It had regret-

tably led to a deterioration in community relations and

distressed many who were earnestly striving to establish

a united society based on justice and equality before

the law.

The Irish Times

(7th September 1971)

Have You Made Your Will?

by a Legal Correspondent

Have you ever thought what happens to the estate if a

husband and wife are killed together in a car smash?

What happens if children die before their parents,

leaving a family of their own ?

Who would look after your children—educate them,

feed and clothe them and provide them with somewhere

to live if you were no longer here to do it yourself?

How will the money to pay estate duty be raised

without selling property which you and your family

would not want to sell ?

If you leave no will to pass on your most valued

possessions they may well have to be sold simply to

avoid a family squabble.

Strict rules are laid down by legislation about the

distribution of your property, but the law is inflexible

and what is fair for one family may be unfair for yours.

With no will to provide for her the widow may have

to divide the estate with her children and this might

even mean that her share is swallowed up in the value

of the home, which she would want to keep, leaving

little or nothing for her to live on.

You may imagine that you are not wealthy enough

to need a will; indeed you may have thought about it

from time to time but put it off because it seemed a

gloomy idea.

A will is not a death warrant. It is a commonsense

and legal method of making certain that your wife,

husband, children or other dependants get the benefit

from everything you leave when you die—your estate—

and that each of them gets what you intended. If you

leave no will at all and you have no immediate relatives,

such as husband, wife or children all your hard-earned

money could end up in the hands of a spendthrift and

distant relative.

The Succession Act, 1965, severely curtailed the free-

dom of a married person to do what he or she wishes

with his (or her) estate by will. The right of the sur-

viving spouse (which is the legal term for husband or

wife) to a share of the estate (the size of the share will

depend upon whether there are children or not) cannot

be taken away by will. Children should have just and

proper provision made for them, otherwise they may

have a claim which will be enforced at law.

Many people do not realise the actual value of their

estates. It is quite easy for a person to die worth several

thousand pounds if he owns a house, a car, a life assur-

ance policy and some moderate savings. But even if all

you leave is a layer of pound notes under the mattress,

you should decide who is going to get them.

There is nothing to stop you from buying a will form

at a stationer's shop and writing out your own will.

Unfortunately, this often leads to serious complications

for the family because it is extremely difficult for the

average man or woman to express beyond all legal

doubt exactly what they want done with their belong-

ings and in the case of a married person what their

legal obligations are to the surviving husband, wife or

children. Mistakes that might be made and doubts cast

will only become known when it is too late to put them

right.

To avoid the risk of mistakes, it is always advisable

to get a solicitor to draw up a will. This suggestion

may sound like self-interest on the part of lawyers, but

they make far more money sorting out the problems

created by home-made wills and what they are supposed

to mean, than they do out of drawing up proper ones.

Before making the will the solicitor will look confiden-

tially into your affairs and suggest how you can best

provide most fairly for your children and other mem-

bers of the family, advise on how estate duty is likely

to affect things and what, if anything,, can be done

about it, what legal obligations, if any, you have under

the Succession Act, and also take into account many

possibilities which you might never consider for your-

self. It. is his job to ascertain your wishes and to express

them so that they will be clear to everybody, have the

legal effect you intend and accord with legislation and,

bv the wav, the best time to make a will is when you

are healthy, relaxed and clear sighted.

136