Previous Page  163 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

BOOK REVIEWS

The Irish Judiciary

by Paul C. Bartholomew; Dublin,

Institute of Public Administration, 1971; 8vo; pp. 86;

£1.25.

The purpose of this book, according to the Preface, is

to take a brief but reasonably thorough look at the

judiciary of Ireland. This purpose is hardly achieved;

in chapter one there is a description of the Irish Courts,

dull but on the whole accurate. Solicitors will resent

the fact that they are described as "the lesser branch of

law" who deal with routine matters" (p. 6). The cases

do not bear out the fact that religion was the dominant

factor in child custody cases (p. 17). There is an all too

brief description of judicial review, and our

Gazette

is

omitted amongst other legal journals (p. 21). The work

of the solicitors is inaccurately described on page 22. It

is not accurate that Chief Justice Conor Maguire was

the last person to appear personally as Attorney

General on behalf of the State (p. 36).

The second chapter deals with present-day Irish

judges and, after interviewing many judges, the author

is right to be critical about the method of appointment

based to a large extent on political considerations.

Doubtless it is true that some judges have proved to be

"obstructive, arrogant and overbearing," however, no

less than 43 per cent consider themselves as liberals.

The fact that most judges are not promoted to a higher

Court undoubtedly ensures their independence. The

lack of consultation amongst legal experts in making

appointments is rightly deplored. The typical Irish

judge is described as living in Dublin, born in urban

surroundings from the upper middle-class, a graduate

of U.C.D. who has legal relatives. There are then five

pages of statistics relating to the judges.

The third part, called Irish Law, is the most unsatis-

factory part of the book. It purports to deal skimpily

with the fundamental rights provisions of the Irish

Constitution, and makes some useful comparison with

the American Constitution. As Professor Bartholomew

specialises in political science and international rela-

tions, and is not a lawyer one need not be surprised that

the constitutional decis

:

ons cited are incomplete. Art.

40 (3) of the Constitution, which is the most funda-

mental provision of our liberties is disposed of in less

than a page.

As Mr. Justice Kingsmill Moore pointed out recently

in introducing this book, it will serve its purpose if the

layman learns more accurate facts about the Irish

judiciary from it.

Litigants in Person.

A Report by Justice; London,

Stevens, 1971; 8vo; pp. 33; £1.

The problem of personal litigants who had no knowl-

edge of law has always presented difficulties, and a

committee of Justice under the chairmanship of Mr.

Rex Church has endeavoured to solve these problems.

It has made the following recommendations.

(1) The personnel of the High Court should be

increased and be so organised as to be able to deal with

the extra work arising from litigants in person. In view

of the manner in which personal litigants are often

encouraged in Ireland at the expense of the legal pro-

fession, this may also be necessary here.

(2) In England, an "amicus curiae" is appointed

from time to time to assist the Court in matters of law

and fact, who does not represent the litigant, but who

has a duty to see that his case does not go by default.

It is suggested that this procedure should be more often

availed of here.

(3) An official of the Court should be appointed so

that the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court might refer

to him an unannounced or ill-prepared application for

the issues to be clarified in a report to the Court. This

appears to be a sensible suggestion.

(4) Provision for civil legal aid and advice should

be extended, and it should be made available if neces-

sary for plaintiffs in libel actions, and for defendants in

libel and slander. This is a worthy suggestion which will

certainly not be followed here.

(5) The High Court should have power to order

legal aid, if, as a case proceeds, it appears necessary in

the interests of justice. This reform would appear to be

essential, but will hardly be implemented he;e.

(6) The costs of a successful represented party should

be paid from public funds when the litigant in person

is impecunious. In this country, lawyers would normally

be willing to act for an impecunious client, if the pros-

pects of winning the action are good. This recommen-

dation would therefore seem superfluous here.

(7) Before any action involving a litigant in person

can be listed for trial, a certificate from the Master of

the High Court would have to be produced that the

documents are in order. This is a sensible suggestion

which would avoid useless duplication.

(8) If a particular litigant is vexatious and pursues

several unmeritorious actions at once, the procedure

for declaring him vexatious should be simplified, and

capable of being brought into effect more easily. It will

be evident that the committee of Justice has taken

much trouble to consider the difficult problem of the

personal litigant and to suggest appropriate remedies.

Constitutional and Administrative Law

by H. W.

Clarke; London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1971; 8vo; pp.

xvi + 206; hardback £2.50, paperback £1.25.

This handy volume, published in the "Concise College

Texts" series by the Principal Lecturer in Law of the

Mid-Essex Technical College, is a most useful and

readable summary of the subjects it purports to cover.

Such matters as "The House of Lords", "The House

of Commons", "The Monarchy", "Parliamentary

Privilege", "Delegated Legislation", "Local Govern-

ment" and "Civil Liberties" are covered in an inter-

esting manner. If only Professor Bartholomew, in

writing his recent pamphlet reviewed in the issue, had

consulted volumes in this series they would have given

him a most useful headline on how to write a readable

volume about law.

C.G.D.

Stroud—Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases.

Fourth edition by John S. James; Volume I : A-C;

London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1971; 8vo; pp. xxiv + 671.

The first edition of this learned work appeared as long

ago as 1890, but the five volumes of the second edition,

165