Previous Page  11 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

11

J A N U A R Y , 2 0 1 8

© iStockphoto.com

THE DOS

AND DON’TS

FOR 2018

By Angela Morisco, Esq.,

Becker & Poliakoff

THE YEAR

IN REVIEW

T

he year 2017 proved to be very successful for

common interest communities in New Jersey. We

are all very familiar with the amendments to the

Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act

(“PREDFDA”) which have enriched the voting rights of

owners in common interest communities.

Also pending in the New Jersey legislature, is a bill

that would require lenders that fail to expedite mortgage

foreclosure actions to pay delinquent maintenance fees or

agree to the appointment of a fiscal agent to rent the prop-

erty and collect the income until the foreclosure action is

completed. This legislation would codify the obligations

of lenders and the right of associations to have a receiver

appointed. The lack of statutory authority to appoint a

receiver or a fiscal agent has caused many judges to

deny this remedy to associations.

In addition to the new legislation, there are some

cases of interest from the New Jersey Appellate

Division that warrant attention as well.

Arbitration vs. Mediation

When it comes to alternative dispute resolution in com-

mon interest communities we now know that semantics

matter. The New Jersey Condominium Act, N.J.S.A.

46:8B-1 et seq. and the Planned Real Estate Development

Full Disclosure Act (PREDFDA) N.J.S.A. 45:22A-21 et

seq. require associations to provide a “fair and efficient”

alternative to litigation to resolve “housing related” dis-

putes. These procedures are commonly referred to as

“ADR”. Neither the Condominium Act or PREDFDA con-

template that ADR must or should be binding. Rather, ADR

is intended as an informal attempt to resolve a dispute that

does not forfeit the right to proceed in court if ADR is not

successful.

Parties, and their counsel, must be mindful of the

labels that are used when selecting and participating

in ADR. The case of

Marano v. The Hills Highlands

Master Association, Inc.,

2017 WL 5494624 (App.

Div. November 16, 2017) is instructive to associations

CONT I NU E S ON PAGE 12