Previous Page  135 / 342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 135 / 342 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/

A

UGUST

1987

Capital Acquisitions Tax

Double Taxa t i on Conven t i on w i t h t he U.S.

The Si tus Rules

Un d er Sec t i on 6 6 of the Cap i tal Acqu i s i t i ons T a x A c t , 1 9 7 6 ,

the G o v e r nme nt may by O r der dec l are that a r r angemen ts

spec i f i ed in the O r der have been ma de w i t h the G o v e r nme nt

of any territory outside the State in relation to affording relief

f r om doub le taxation in respect of Gift T ax or Inheritance T ax

under Irish Leg i s l at ion and any T a x impo s ed under the l aws

of that other territory w h i c h is of a similar cha r ac t er or is

cha r geab le by reference to dea th or to Gi f ts inter v i vos.

Two Conventions relating to

double taxation are now in force: —

(a) with the U.K. under Statutory

Instrument No. 279 of 1 978,

this Convention applies to

Gifts and Inheritances;

and

(b) with the U.S.A., the prov-

isions of the First Schedule to

the Finance Act, 1950 being

applied to U.S. Federal Estate

Tax and Irish Inheritance Tax

under Article 1 (2). This Con-

vention is considered to apply

only to Inheritances.

There are various ways in which

Double Taxation conventions can

work but basically relief is confin-

ed to two types:

(a) where the ordinary Rules of

each independent State app-

ly and relief is given for Tax

in one State against Tax in

the other on property which

is doubly taxed i.e. taxed in

both States

or

(b)

(b) Article V provides the relief by

way of credit for the Tax

levied in the country where

the property is situate against

the tax leviable in the other

country.

by

Brian A. Bohan,

Solicitor

by providing a special situs

code

wh i ch

will

pre-

determine where certain pro-

perty or type of property is

situate and that such proper-

ty or type of property will on-

ly be subject to Tax in the

Country where it is situate.

The convention with the U.K. is

of the first type, whereas the con-

vention with the U.S.A. is a mix of

the two types. It is with this latter

convention that this Article is con-

cerned.

The principal features are con-

tained in Articles III to V.

(a) Articles III (1) and IV confirm

the ordinary Rules relating to

domicile and territorial scope

of the two Taxes.

(c) Article III (2) contains the

Situs Rules relating to assets

where the deceased is

domiciled in either Ireland or

the U.S.A., or both. It

changes the situs of certain

classes of property, which

can have the e f f ect of

avoiding Tax in one or other

of the countries.

There are, therefore, two types

of relief as mentioned before, viz: —

(a)

Double Taxation relief.

(b) Relief by

situs.

There is no provision in the con-

vention for relief against In-

heritance or other Death Taxes of

the various states of the U.S.A.,

although unilateral relief could be

given under Section 67 of the

C.A.T. Act, 1976 for such Taxes.

This section might also apply to

give relief in respect of Irish Gift

Tax and Federal Estate Tax on Gifts

which are, otherwise, not dealt

with in the convention.

The convention in the Finance

Act, 1950, is not identical in all

respects with the convention bet-

ween Great Britain and the U.S.

contained in the Double Taxation

Relief (Estate Duty) (U.S.A.) Order,

1946 in the U.K. (S.R. & 0. 1946,

No. 1351),. although the dif-

ferences are minimal.

Article III (1)

Article III (1) of the Irish conven-

tion provides that each country is

to ascertain domicile in accordance

with its own Law and there is,

therefore, always the possibility

that there could be a double

domicile.

The question whether a person

is an American citizen is determin-

ed exclusively by American law.

American nationality is treated

the same as domicile, giving the

U.S. authority to charge tax on

global property. Once a person is

a national of the U.S.A., it is im-

material if he is not domiciled there

from the point of view of Federal

Estate Tax; his global estate will be

subject to Federal Estate Tax. If he

was domiciled in the U.S.A., it is

immaterial of which country he

was a national. Article IV (2)

provides that, for the purpose of

tax and aggregation, neither

country will take account of

property situate outside its

territory if the deceased was

domiciled in the other country.

This Rule, however, does not apply

where both countries claim the

domicile.

The Rule is subject to two ex-

ceptions:

(a) it will not apply in respect of

U.S. Tax in the case of a U.S.

citizen dying domiciled in

Ireland;

or

(b) in respect of Irish tax, in the

case of property passing

under a disposition governed

by Irish law (Settled Property).

By this means, the ordinary law

of the respective states has been

maintained.

Article III (2)

Article III (2) provides a

situs

code

to be applied by both countries

125