Previous Page  137 / 342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 342 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/

A

UGUST

1987

where the disponer dies domiciled

in either or both, but the proviso at

the end of the Article limits its

operation.

The

Situs

Code is printed in full

at the end of this article.

Where the property does not fall

within the

Situs

Rules, the locality

will be determined according to the

law of the country other than that

country in which the disponer was

domiciled.

The

proviso

in Article III (2)

states that if, apart from its Rules,

including the last mentioned Rule,

any property would: —

(a) be situate in the territory of

one of the t wo countries,

and

(b) be liable to duty in that

country,

then the Rules are not to apply to

such property unless, by reason of

their application or otherwise, du-

ty would be imposed or would, but

for some specific exemption, be

imposed thereon by the

other

country.

This Supplementary Rule ap-

pears to mean that if property, for

exmaple, is situated in Ireland

under General Law but is deemed

under the

Situs

Rules, to be

situated in the U.S.A., the

Situs

Rules will not apply to that proper-

ty unless, by reason of their

application or otherwise, duty

would be imposed in the U.S.A. on

that property, or would be so

imposed but for some specific

exemption (e.g. initial exemption)

on that property.

The object of this is to prevent

escape of tax in both countries.

For example, L. T., an American-

domiciled citizen, is life-tenant

under his father's (U.S. domiciled)

settlement, which contains an

Irish bank account.

There is no U.S. tax because

the life-tenant was neither the

settlor nor competent to dispose

of the property in settlement;

Article III (2) (c) would deem the

Bank Account to be situate in

the U.S. under normal circum-

stances.

Because of this, the Account

would escape tax in both coun-

tries. However, the proviso en-

sures that Rule (c), under which the

account would be deemed situate

in America, does not apply and Irish

Inheritance Tax would be payable

on the account.

On the other hand, if a person

domiciled in the U.S. owns as part

of his Free Estate Irish Government

Securities, their

situs

is deemed

under Rule (c) of Article III (2) to be

in America, and Inheritance Tax

would not be payable on them even

though no tax is payable in the U.S.

by reason of an exemp t i on

threshold.

Article IV (3) preserves the right

of the Irish Authorities to impose

tax on a settlement having Irish

proper law.

Article V contains the provisions

relating to the allowance or credit

for tax in the other country.

Where either country imposes

tax by reason of domicile or, in the

case of the U.S. being its national,

on property situate solely in the

other country, the first country is

to give a credit against its tax for

the tax imposed on the same pro-

perty in the second country, but

the credit is not to exceed the

amount of the tax on that proper-

ty in the first country. For example,

where property which is situate in

the U.S.A. is taken on the death of

a disponer who dies domiciled in

Ireland, an allowance against In-

heritance Tax is made for the

amount of the Federal Estate Tax

(up to the amount of the In-

heritance Tax) payable in respect

of the same property. The same

will apply if the domiciles and situa-

tion were reversed and, for this

purpose, locality or

situs

is deter-

mined in accordance with Article III

(2).

Article V

In paragraph (3) of Article V, if the

property is taken under a disposi-

tion regulated by Irish law, credit

will also be given in Ireland.

Article V (2) provides for propor-

tionate relief applicable where the

disponer is deemed to be domicil-

ed in both countries and property

taken on his death is treated as

situate in both countries.

Where this

happens,

an

allowance is to be made by each

country on the basis that the duty

in each country is to be propor-

tionately reduced to such an extent

that the total duty payable in both

is equal to the greater of the

amounts which would otherwise

be payable in the t wo countries

separately. For example if £400.00

is the amount of the Inheritance

Tax on the doubly taxed property

and £600.00 is the amount of the

Federal Estate Tax on the property

(apart from the Convention) then

the credit is as follows:

Total

Federal

Estate Inheritance

Tax

Tax

Tax

before

credit £600.00

£400.00 £1,000.00

Credit £240.00

£160.00

£400.00

(600 x 400)

(400 x 400)

(1000

(1000

Net

Tax

£360.00

£240.00

£600.00

N.B. The lesser amount of Tax is always

utilised for the purpose of this calculation.

The latter part of Article IV (4) pro-

vides for the case where Ireland

and the U.S.A. both deem domicile

and there is property situate in a

third territory which is taxed in that

third territory, on the basis of

Situs

there. For example, the tax on this

property before the application of

any double taxation relief is as

follows: —

Tax in Third Territory£200.00

Tax in Ireland

£400.00

Tax in U.S.A.

£600.00

The Third Territory tax remains at

£200.00. Under a Convention with

the Third Territory, or under Sec-

tion 67 of the C.A.T. Act, 1976,

Ireland gives a credit of £200.00

against Inheritance Tax and claims

a net amount of £200.00 Tax. The

U.S.A. also gives a credit of

£200.00 against its tax (under a

Convention or unilaterally) and

claims a net amount of £400.00

tax.

The credit to be given is then:

Federal Estate Inheritance

Tax

Tax

£400.00

Credit £130.00

(400 x 200)

(600

)

Tax

Total

£200.00

£600.00

£70.00

£200.00

(200 x 200)

(600

)

Net

Tax

£270.00

£130.00

£400.00

Third Territory

£200.00

£600.00

127