Previous Page  301 / 342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 301 / 342 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1987

Annual Law Services

We set o u t he r eunder t he add r esses by t he A r c h b i s h op o f

Dub l i n, t he Mo s t Reve r end D. A . Ca i r d, and by t he Mo s t

Reve r end De smo nd Wi l l i ams, D.D., Au x i l i a ry B i s hop o f

Dub l i n, g i ven at t he Ch u r ch o f I r e l and a nd Roman Ca t ho l ic

Se r v i ces t o ma r k t he c omme n c eme nt o f t he M i c h a e l mas

T e rm on 5 t h Oc t ober 1 9 8 7 .

Most Reverend D. A. Caird

Justice, like other virtues, is usually

conspicuous only in its absence.

Those who would find it difficult to

define or even to discuss justice in

the abstract, find no difficulty in

seeing the injustice in a situation

presented, for instance, by one of

those teams of investigative re-

porters on radio or television,

where an old couple are cheated

out of their life savings by the false

promises of a crook, and are

brought to face penury and disaster

at the end of their lives. We see the

injustice clearly and we boil with in-

dignation, because the dignity of

another human being has been

assailed and hurt. But to define

justice in the abstract is another

matter which has engaged the

most subtle minds recorded in

history, engaged and often

defeated.

The

Republic

of Plato is a sus-

tained attempt to define Justice

both at the level of the Greek city-

state and at the level of the in-

dividual citizen. Following the

Socratic method he reviewed and

dismissed various contemporary

definitions of Justice, including the

cynical definition of Thrassy-

machus that justice is the interest

of the strong party; he reached his

own definition that Justice is "the

harmony of the virtues", that it is

the quality which enables the in-

dividual to live at peace with

himself and which enables all the

classes and denizens of the State

to live in peace and co-operation

for the good of the whole.

Such a wide definition is perhaps

of little help to us in our search to

discover what justice requires in

given specific circumstances. But

it does turn our mind in the right

direction, and through its emphasis

on the community as well as the in-

dividual, it balances another defini-

tion of Justice which has had great

influence in Western society: the

classical definition of St. Thomas

— reddere suum cui —

to every

man his due.

Again we are not really helped

forward by this definition, for the

very fount of our dilemma is to

determine what is due to a man or

woman in the particular circum-

stances of their lives. It is for the

wisdom and insight to determine

this within the great framework of

the system of laws which has

grown up over centuries, indeed

millenia, and which embodies the

experience of society through the

ages, that we pray.

Though

"reddere suum cui"

can

only be a very rough guide to the

nature of just dealing at the com-

plex level of sophisticated modern

society in determining, for in-

stance, a just pay level in relation

to the work which various groups

and individuals in society do, in

relation to one another: e.g., the

miner and the stockbroker, the

dentist and the deepsea fisherman,

the home help and the actress,

where incomparable values are in-

volved, where taste and choice are

active and where no common unit

can be employed; this definition is

significant, however, at the level of

basic human rights, in the context

of what is due to each human be-

ing, as a human being, irrespective

of race, creed, class, colour,

education, work, religious or

political outlook or affiliation.

The attempt to define and list

those basic human rights may be

traced to the Decalogue (Ex-

odus 20). The six commandments

defining one's duty to one's

neighbour could well be cast in

terms of human rights, while the

first four commandments may be

regarded as the theological pro-

logue to the declaration. The

Decalogue was given when the na-

tion of Israel was reduced to its

bare bones in the desert. These

were the minimum moral require-

ments to maintain the life and

harmony of the nation at the level

of its desert wanderings, when all

superfluous social structures had

been abandoned and rock bottom

reached in the life of a people.

José Bonino, reflecting on the

present deep concern of the Chris-

tian world with this issue of human

rights, writes: "When this joint

origin, Hebrew, Greek and Chris-

tian, of modern freedom is

recognised, it becomes possible to

explore the Christian element in it,

although it is impossible to isolate

it from other moments in this

dynamic. It is this Christian ele-

ment that gives Christians a strong

basis to stand for human rights in

the critical situations which are fac-

ed in many areas of the world. The

search for theological foundations

has gravitated in the direction of

securing a firm basis for the univer-

sality of human dignity and rights.

It has rested basically on the doc-

trine of creation and/or the doctrine

of redemption. The human being as

God's creation and his image, has

his or her dignity as God's steward

and representative, the unity of the

human race constitutes a strong

basis for asserting the rights of

all."

For theologians like Jurgen

Moltman the quest for human

rights has resolved itself largely

into a question of human dignity,

witness his book "On Human

Dignity". All human rights derive

from the dignity of mankind. "The

task of Christian theology," he

writes, "does not lie in presenting

once again what thousands of

jurists, parliamentarians and

diplomats in the United Nations

have already completed. However,

Christian theology also cannot

dispense itself from the discussion

of and the struggle for the

realisation of human rights. In the

name of the creation of man

according to the image of God, in

the name of the incarnation of God

for the reconciliation of the world,

and in the name of the coming

Kingdom of God for the fulfilment

of history, the Church is charged

with the responsibility for the

humanity of man as well as for his

rights and duties in time. We see

the theological contribution of the

Christian Church in the grounding

of the fundamental human rights

upon God's right to man. The

Christian faith has over and above

the different rights and duties of

291