Previous Page  327 / 342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 327 / 342 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1987

Due to a nearby fire alarm

operating for nearly half an hour

making continuance of the meeting

in the President's Hall impossible,

the meeting adjourned to the

Members Lounge.

Mr. John Buckley suggested that

the adoption of the Resolution as

it stood would leave the Council

with a very long tail of Past

Presidents. While he had sympathy

with the principle of the Resolution,

he felt that to make it practical past

Presidents should only be allowed

the vote for a further three years at

maximum. Mr. Don Binchy said

that when the idea of service on

the Council by Past Presidents was

first offered it was done so as to in-

duce young members to go for

election to the Council. In practice

that had not happened.

Committee Work

Mr. Adrian Bourke said the for-

mula worked out some years ago

was satisfactory in that the major

work of the Council was done in

Committees. The attendance re-

quirement would be more mean-

ingful if it embraced attendance at

Committees as well as at the Coun-

cil. Mr. Daire Murphy said there

was a continuing concern that the

Council could be remote from the

ordinary members. One answer to

those who felt remote was that it

was up to them to elect their own

representatives. The Law Society

needed an input from Past

Presidents but was a vote

necessary to achieve that input? It

would be open to Past Presidents

to stand for election if they wanted

to vote. Mr. P. Brennan welcomed

any development which would give

the Law Society the benefit of the

long experience of Past Presidents,

but Mr. Andy Smyth asked why, if

the Resolution was adopted, Past

Presidents would bother going up

for election since under the Resolu-

tion they would have a vote.

Mr. Justin McKenna supported

the Resolution since he did not

regard the absence of Past

Presidents from the election list as

a threat to democracy. Mr. Pat

O'Connor supported the motion

but would like a limit in the number

of years of entitlement as sug-

gested earlier.

Mr. Michael Williams said that

the Council was elected from year

to year and people have a vote in

the Council because they are

elected in that particular year. In

that way, over time, the changing

views within the profession are ac-

commodated. Insofar as the

Resolution was concerned, there

would be no problem until the voice

of those wanting change was out-

voted by the votes of the more

conservative Past Presidents. Ms.

Anne Neary wondered how many

additional votes the resolution

would produce. She pointed out

that out of a profession of about

3,500, only 1,100 bothered to

vote.

Mr. Peter Prentice said that he

was the originator of the motion to

allow past Presidents to attend the

Council on the basis that while

there was need for an experienced

view on the Council, the up-and-

coming members should not find it

too difficult to get elected. He was

opposed to the Motion and was

supported by Mr. Bruce St. J.

Blake. Mr. Curran then replied.

On a show of hands the motion

was defeated.

The President then dealt with the

Reports of the various committees.

On the report of the Education

Committee, Mr. Desmond Moran

referred to the article on Court Eti-

quette in the November issue of

the Gazette dealing with the Ad-

vocacy Course. He commented

that he was disappointed at the

standard of cross examination

shown by younger solicitors and

wondered how many of the

modern apprentices were brought

to an action by their Masters. The

remaining sections of the report

were agreed. The Annual Report of

the Council was then adopted.

Election of Auditors

Mr. Margetson proposed the re-

appointment of Messrs. Coopers &

Lybrand as Auditors to the Society

for the coming year. He welcomed

Mr. Dick Lane, a partner of the firm

and Mr. Brendan Kavanagh, Audit

Manager, and thanked them for

their help to the Society over the

year. The proposal was seconded

by Mr. D. Binchy and agreed.

Council for 1987 / 88

The Scrutineers Report which

was tabled was accepted. The

outcome of the ballot was as

follows:-

Total

Votes

1. Quinlan, Moya

1099

2. Binchy, Donal G.

1053

3. O'Donnell, Rory

1050

4. Ensor, Anthony H.

1048

5. O'Donnell, P. Frank

980

6. O'Mahony, Michael V. 958

7. Bourke, Adrian P.

938

8. Pigot, David R.

937

9. Margetson, Ernest J.

915

10. Collins, Anthony E.

906

11. Clarke, Geraldine M.

879

12. O'Connor, Patrick

875

13. Smyth, Andrew F.

856

14. Shields, Laurence K.

853

1 5. Lynch, Elma

840

16. Daly, Francis D.

837

17. Daly, Patrick J.

830

18. Monahan, Raymond T. 828

19. McMahon, Brian M.

817

20. Irvine, Michael Glynn

815

21. Cullen, Laurence

813

22. Curran, Maurice R.

799

23. Mahon, Brian J.

794

24. Glynn, Patrick A.

782

25. Murphy, Ken

779

26. Killeen, Carmel S.

743

27. Matthews, Vivian C.

709

28. Harte, John B.

675

29. Donegan, James D.

671

30. Griffin, Gerard F.

657

Note

Under Bye Law 29A the Senior

Vice President (Mr. Thomas D.

Shaw) is deemed to be elected.

Provincial Delegates

Connaught - McEllin, Edward M.

Leinster

- Lanigan, Frank

Munster

- O'Connell, Michael

Ulster

- Murphy, Peter F. R.

Single European Act

In the absence of Mr. T. C. G.

O'Mahony (abroad) and Mr. Bren-

dan Garvan who had to leave the

meeting earlier, the following mo-

tion was proposed by Mr. Anthony

Murphy and seconded by Mr.

Brendan Fahy:-

"We call on the Council of the

Society and/or its appropriate

Committee(s) to explain the

neglect of the Society to in-

vestigate and enlighten the

country on the serious constitu-

tional implications of the Single

European Act, or to lend ap-

propriate assistance or co-

operation to Legal Consultative

Council on its lone pioneering of

this enormous task.

317