GAZETTE
Viewpoints 71 The Judge in Ireland 73 Practice Note 81 Reciprocity of Qualifications and Employment Oppor- tunities abroad 83In Brief
85
Keep it out of Court 89 Book Review 93Uninsured Drivers —
A Legal Submission
95
Professional Information
101
•
Executive Editor:
Mary Buckley
Editorial Board:
Charles R. M. Meredith, Chairman
John F. Buckley
Gary Byrne
Daire Murphy
Michael V. O'Mahony
Maxwell Sweeney
Advertising:
Sean 0 hOisin. Telephone: 305236
307860
Printing:
Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.
The views expressed in this publication,
save where otherwise indicated, are the
views of the contributors and not
necessarily the views of the Council of
the Society.
The appearance of an advertisement in
this publication does not necessarily
indicate approval by the Society for the
product or service advertised.
Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.
Tel.: 710711.
Telex: 31219.
Cover photo: ^
710704
'
Law Society Council Dinner.
The President of the Law Society, David
R. Pigot (left) with Tom Burgess, Presi-
dent, Law Society of Northern Ireland
GAZETT
APRIL 1987
INCORPORATE D
LAWSOCIETY
OF IRELAND
Vol. 81 No. 3Apri l 1987
Viewpoints
It seems curious that at a time
when a major British publisher is
announc i ng the f o r t h c om i ng
publication of " A Guide to the
Small Hotels of Britain and
Ireland", new regulations made by
Bord Failte seem likely to ensure
that, in Dublin and Cork at least, no
new small hotels will ever come in-
to being.
The new regulations which Bord
Failte proposes to make in 1987
will require an applicant seeking to
register a new hotel in the Dublin
and Cork Metropolitan districts to
provide at least 45 guest
bedrooms. The same regulation
will apply to applicants for registra-
tion where premises have not been
registered in the Register in any of
the three preceding years. Practi-
tioners will be aware of the con-
siderable difficulties which have
arisen in relation to "licensed
premises" which appeared to have
a publican's licence, but where in
fact the only licence in existence
was a hotel licence, which was no
longer valid, the premises being no
longer registered as a hotel.
The new proposals are disturbing
in that they seem to reveal an
attitude in Bord Failte which leans
in favour of the construction of
those faceless hotels whose inter-
nal layout is so similar that the
visitor loses all sense of identity of
the country or city in which the
hotel is situate once he passes
through its doors. One of the great
virtues of the hotel industry in con-
tinental Europe, in countries such
as France, Switzerland and Austria
is the attractive family-run small
hotels, even in the largest cities.
Impersonality is only too readily
available in the current world and
it seems a pity that Bord Failte
seem determined to increase it's in-
fluence in Ireland.
Snatch and Grab
The publicity given to recent
tug-of-love cases involving the
removal of children in the custody
of one parent in one country
to another by the other parent
highlights the deficiencies of our
legal system in this area. In
one case, the President of the
High Court, on being advised
that the parent who had removed
a child from the custody of
the other parent in Ireland was
believed to have left the juris-
diction, was reported as having
said that there was little he could
do to assist in such circumstances.
His position would have been
very different had this country
become a party to the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduc t i on
adopted in 1980, as recommended
by the Law Reform Commission
in 1985 and given the Convention
the force of law in this jurisdiction.
The Convention, which the
United States, the United Kingdom,
Canada, France, Portugal and
Switzerland have adopted, has as
its principal purpose the return to
its country of habitual residence of
any child who has been unlawfully
abducted into another country. The
appropriate authority in the coun-
try to which the child has been
taken is requested to order its
return to the country of habitual
residence if legal proceedings are
instituted. In addition, the Conven-
tion establishes a system of co-
operation between centralised
authorities in each country to
facilitate and expedite the repatria-
tion process.
The Convention, while in one
sense limiting the powers of Courts
of a country to exercise its own
jurisdiction over persons within its
(Contd. on p.73)
71