Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

148

SOLANGE MASLOWSKI

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ

labour market of older Member States. The economic dimension of these restriction

periods was clear as they just concern nationals of Central and Eastern European

countries, leaving apart nationals of Malta and Cyprus.

Similarly, the financial and economic crisis has led to increasing the economic

imbalance between the 28th Member States (mainly between Northern and Eastern

and Southern Europe). Consequently, a certain part of nationals of Southern and

Eastern Member States have moved to the northern and western part of Europe

seeking employment. Among these some who had found work in the host Member

States lost their jobs after the crisis.

– New behaviors and requirements from the host Member States

These phenomena had a considerable impact on the host Member States’ vision

of Freedom of movement of Union citizens. Richer Member States became reluctant

to accept economically inactive Union citizens and to provide social assistance.

They are afraid that these citizens will become unreasonable burdens on their social

assistance system. This fear has led to the misuse of Articles 7 and 24 of Directive

2004/38/EC by certain Member States.

• Abuse of Member States’ expulsion powers

Some Member States are interpreting the request for social assistance from

Union citizens on the move as a declaration of non-self-sufficiency. And, following

this reasoning, they consider them as not legal residents and then as eligible for

expulsions. This has been a common practice in Belgium, where three thousand

Union citizens were expelled in 2013 on the grounds of lacking sufficient financial

resources. Such practice has been clearly forbidden by the European Commission, the

Court of Justice and Article 14-3 of Directive 2004/38/EC.

36

The direct link made

between a request for social assistance and non-self-sufficiency by certain Member

States has been criticized by the Court, which states that social assistance and grants

are provided to promote a variety of different policy objectives non-related to the

principle of self-sufficiency. Indeed, even self-sufficient persons are applying for

social assistance, for example, family benefits. Linking these two elements directly

is very dangerous, because it leads the Member State to use the most severe sanction

against Union citizens, expulsion from its territory.

• Requirements for reforming freedom of movement of persons

Certain Member States are of the opinion that the current provisions of freedom

of movement are too liberal and endanger national interests. The propositions for

36

Application to social assistance or student grants does not mean automatically non-self-sufficiency

(Commission v Austria C-75/11, para. 58) and it should not lead automatically to an expulsion

measure (Article 14-3 of Directive 2004/38/EC).