Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

13

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ

PRINCIPLES OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS ȃ

JUS COGENS

?

of the existence and coexistence in the modern international community, and that

aggression is a crime under international law. In all instances where armed force was

used in relations between States after the year 1945, there were attempts to consider

and legally justify them as admissible exceptions to that principle, e.g. as self-defence

in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter; or as the application of the principles

determined in Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Numerous international documents,

which I do not need to list here, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, validate

this principle of the UN Charter and prove that there exists a broad consensus within

the international community, States, and other subjects constituting the international

community regarding the Charter principle of the prohibition of the use of armed

force in international relations, as it is defined in the Declaration of Seven Principles.

Similar considerations apply to other principles defined in Article 2 of the Charter,

i.e. the principle of a peaceful settlement of international disputes, the principle of

non-intervention in domestic affairs of any State, and in this context particularly

the principle prohibiting armed intervention, the principle of the right of peoples

to self-determination,

16

the principle of the obligation of international cooperation,

the principle of the sovereign equality of States, and the principle of the obligation

to fulfil in good faith the obligations assumed by them. There is no doubt about the

obligation to comply with these principles of international law, and in our modern

international community there cannot be any. There exists a broad consensus about

them and their nature as foundations of the modern international legal order, such as

defined above as a condition for

jus cogens

.

These “fundamental” principles of the UN Charter protect the values on which

the modern international community and, we could even say, human society and its

existence are based. International peace, protection from war and other uses of armed

forces, peaceful settlement of international disputes, sovereign equality of States,

non-intervention in the domestic matters of any State, and the prohibition of armed

intervention, the right of all nations to decide freely on their destiny and not to be

under foreign domination, international cooperation and the compliance with and

fulfilment of obligations assumed by them are fundamental values of our time. These

are the fundamental values

protected

by the principles of the Charter. Besides the broad

consensus (consensus part) of the international community, the value aspect (content

part) also exists, as this is a condition for a norm or principle of international law to

be

jus cogens

, that is to say, the rule or principle of law that States cannot arbitrarily

derogate from. On the contrary, a treaty that would, for instance, allow for the use of

armed force against another State in international relations, outside the scope of the

principle referred to in point 4 of Article 2 of the Charter and as further specified in

the Declaration of Seven Principles, would be, according to Article 53 of the VCLT,

16

On the right to self-deteminatiom as

jus cogens

see E. PETRIČ,

Pravica narodov do samoodločbe

[The

Right of Peoples to Self-determination], Maribor 1984, p. 64.