GAZETTE
B
K
W
I
M
N
A
GEM N
JUNE 1993
Annual Review of Irish Law,
1991
R. Byrne and W. Binchy, [Dublin,
The Round Hall Press, 1993, 1 +
494 pp, IR£85.00, hardback.]
Lewis F. Powell, Jr, Associate
Justice, Supreme Court of the
United States, (retired), writing on
the late Professor Paul Freund of
Harvard University stated that when
Paul and he were at Harvard, the
university there could fairly boast
that its law faculty included the lions
of the legal academy: Felix
Frankfurter was teaching
Administrative Law, Thomas Reed
Powell instructing Constitutional
Law, and Roscoe Pound teaching
Jurisprudence. [106
Harvard Law
Review,
3 (1992)].
The time will come when lawyers
will look at our time and note that
Raymond Byrne and William Binchy
were among the great lions of the
Irish legal academy. Apart from their
other achievements and works, their
Annual Review of Irish Law,
will
have secured their reputation for
posterity. To some, this may appear
grandiose, but not to readers of the
Annual Review,
now in its fifth
volume.
For those who may not yet be
familiar with the
Annual Review,
the
present volume provides a review of
legal developments, judicial and
statutory, that occurred in 1991. The
law is considered under thirty-three
main headings with several sub-
headings. The main headings include
Administrative Law, Agriculture,
Commercial Law, Company Law,
Constitutional Law, Contract Law,
Company Law, European
Communities, Family Law, Labour
Law, Practice and Procedure, Safety
and Health and Torts.
Previous reviews have stated that the
Annual Review
is "a very thorough
guide" and "an invaluable aid" to
have all the relevant case law and
legislative developments for one year
so readily available in one volume.
As early as the first volume, this
writer described the achievement as
heralding the inauguration of a new
Irish institution. We have not been
disappointed. An investment in the
Annual Review
should be repaid
handsomely.
Dr. Eamonn G. Hall
The Law of Information
Technology in Europe 1992:
A comparison with the USA
Edited by A.P. Meijboom and C.
Prins. Published by Kluwer as part
of its Computer Law Series.
This book consists of a series of
chapters by expert EC authors on
the interaction between EC law
(competition, intellecutal property,
products liability, and
telecommunications) and
Information Technology (IT) in the
context of the completion of the
Single Market. The US authors
provide an overview of the
corresponding legal situation in the
USA.
The law of IT covers computer
hardware and software and
telecommunications.
The book is divided into five parts,
Part I provides an introduction to
EC law for those who are not
familiar with the way the EC
operates.
Part II highlights the effect of EC
competition law on distribution
agreements, transfers of technology,
and joint ventures in the computer
industry. The European experience is
not unsimilar to the effect of the
Sherman and Clayton Acts on the
American IT sector.
The most extensive coverage is given
to intellectual property protection in
Part III. Developments such as the
European Patent Convention and the
Community Patent Convention. The
effective protection of the look and
feel and sequence of software and
databases continues to cause
difficulties in Europe and America.
In particular the limits of copyright
protection in relation to the
interoperability of user interfaces.
Dr. Thomas Hoeran explains how
computer chip protection in Europe
was a response to the US
Semiconductor Chip Protection Act
1984 (SCPA) which introduced sui
generis protection for American
chips, and denied it to EC chip
makers in the absence of reciprocity.
Like the SCPA EC Directive
87/54/EEC incorporated elements of
patent, copyright and competitive
law.
In Chapter 10,
Erik C.
Nootenboom
discusses the current and future EC
initiatives in the field of Trade Mark
law which has limited importance for
the protection of IT products and
services. The following chapter
compares US Trademark law and
practice.
Part IV of the makes a novel
application of the EC Directive on
Products Liability to injuries caused
to consumers by IT products. This
includes a discussion on who should
bear the risk for software failures.
David Bender
explains how US
products liability differs from the
European model.
Finally the development of a
European telecommunications
network infrastructure which
includes the development of a pan-
137