Previous Page  366 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 366 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

NOVEMBER 1993

LRC Examines Plain Language

According to its Annual Report for

1992, the Law Reform Commission is

examining the language of the law to

see whether a policy of plain language

should be adopted in Ireland. The

Commission notes that many common

law jurisdictions, in particular

Australia, the United States and the

United Kingdom, have done extensive

work in the area of plain language and

the law. Some of these jurisdictions

have enacted statutes requiring the use

of plain language in a variety of

situations. The report says that the

Commission hopes to publish its

consultation paper on the area in 1993

and has decided to focus on plain

language in legislation. The

consultation paper will examine Irish

legislation to see whether there is

room for improvement and then look

at other jurisdictions to assess

developments there.

Among the work accomplished by the

Law Reform Commission in 1992,

was a report submitted to the Attorney

General on the United Nations

(Vienna) Convention on the

International Sale of Goods, which

confirmed the provisional

recommendations of the Commission

in an earlier discussion paper. The

working group on Land Law and

Conveyancing Law presented a

further report, containing general

proposals, which was submitted to the

Attorney General in September, 1992.

The report identified anomalies in the

law, the origins of which vary from

the continuing existence of obsolete

provisions to unforeseen difficulties

which have been created by more

modern legislation, (see review of the

report in this issue of the

Gazette

on

page 351). The Commission also

presented its report on the law of

dishonesty to the Attorney General.

Work continues on a final report

containing recommendations on

contempt of court, a discussion paper

on the law of privacy, research into

the area of structured settlements and

a report on the law of occupiers'

liability. A discussion paper on family

courts is also in preparation.

In the annual report of the

Commission, it notes that the

Criminal Evidence Act, 1992,

substantially adopted the

Commission's recommendations on

the taking of evidence from children

made in its report on child sexual

abuse (LRC 32-1990), the

Commission's recommendations

relating to proof of business records

in its report on receiving of stolen

property (LRC 23-1987) and

proposals relating to the evidence of

spouses in the Commission's report

on the competence and compellability

of spouses as witnesses (LRC 13-

1985).

Copies o f t h e 14th Report (1992) of

the Law Reform Commission are

available from the Commission at

Ardilaun Centre, 111 St. Stephen's

Green, Dublin 2, price £2.00.

Lawbrief

(Continued from page 342)

to the Court whether (a) the report

is to be treated as part of the

testimony of the witness (in which

event the witness should be asked

to explain or supplement the

report) or (b) whether it is offered

merely for the convenience of the

court and as an

aide-memoire.

3. The above procedures should

apply

mutatis mutandis

in the case

of reports obtained from other

expert witnesses, for example

engineers, architects, actuaries,

accountants, welfare consultants

(and to photographs and maps

annexed to such reports) in

personal injury actions and other

types of actions.

4. The parties may, by agreement,

exchange before the trial, their

reports on a reciprocal basis. But

the absence of agreement to do so

should not in itself be a ground for

refusing to cooperate at the trial in

the procedures outlined above.

5. This direction replaces the practice

direction published in the Legal

Diary on 11 January, 1993.

LAW

LIBRARY

PHONES

Solicitors phoning

barristers at the Law

Library are requested to

use the Direct Dial

Numbers which were

distributed with the june

issue of the Gazette.

Further copies are

available from the Law

Library -

phone

8720622.

Where a barrister is not at

his/her desk your call will

be answered either by

the switchboard or the

member's voicemail. The

only circumstances in

which the Direct Dial

number is not answered

is where the barrister has

forwarded calls to

another extension but is

not at that extension

when you phone.

John Dowling

Director

344