Previous Page  97 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

MARCH 1993

Disciplinary Cases

Re: Roderick St. John Walshe

185 Fortfield Road,

Terenure, Dublin 6.

31 SA /1990

Application for restoration to the

Roll - opposed by the Law Society

- granted subject to conditions

On 13 January, 1993, the acting

President of the High Court, granted

an application by Roderick St. John

Walshe to be restored to the Roll of

Solicitors, subject to the condition

that he would be entitled to apply

for a practising certificate only as an

assistant solicitor to a solicitor of

not less than ten years standing, and

subject also to an arrangement with

the Compensation Fund Committee

to repay any debts due to the Fund,

or former clients, out of his salary

in such amounts as deemed fit by

the Committee. Counsel on behalf of

the solicitor agreed to the imposition

of conditions.

Re: Greg O'Neill

21 Clare Street, Dublin 2.

15 SA/1992

Petition to strike off -

missappropriation of clients monies

- breaches of Solicitors Accounts

Regulations - censure and

restrictions on practising certificate

imposed.

On 12 January, 1992, the acting

President of the High Court refused

the petition of the Society to strike

Greg O'Neill off the Roll of

Solicitors.

The Court had before it the report

of the Disciplinary Committee of its

hearing on 25 February, 1992, in

which the committee made a finding

that the solicitor had been guilty of

misconduct tending to bring the

profession into disrepute in that the

solicitor had, inter alia,

misappropriated clients' funds and

committed breaches of the Solicitors

Accounts Regulations.

The High Court ordered that the

solicitor be censured. An ancilliary

order was made that as and from 30

April, 1993, he cease to practise

other than as an assistant solicitor to

a solicitor of not less than ten years'

standing.

Re: Peter McGarry

Cregg Road, Glenamaddy,

Co. Galway.

14/SA 1992

Petition to strike-off -

misappropriation of clients' funds -

falsifying ledger accounts - false

statements to the Compensation

Fund Committee.

On 12 January, 1993, the President

of the High Court made an Order

striking the name of Peter McGarry

off the Roll of Solicitors. The Court

had before it the report of the

Disciplinary Committee of an

enquiry held on 8 August, 1991, 3

December, 1991 and 21 January,

1992. The Committee found that the

solicitor was guilty of conduct

tending to bring the profession into

dispute, in that he, inter alia,

• misappropriated a client's monies

in the sum of £9,000 and applied

same for his personal use,

• falsified the ledger account of the

said client,

• made a false statement concerning

the misappropriation to the

Compensation Fund Committee

of the Society,

• improperly lodged client's monies,

received to cover outlay, to the

office account of the practice,

Costs were awarded to the Society.

Re: John B. Doheriy

8 Lower Main Street, Letterkenny,

Co. Donegal.

35 SA/1992

Petition to strike-off - delay in

administration of an estate -

restrictions on practising certificate

imposed.

36 SA/1992

Fine - delay in completion of title

- failure to reply to Society's

correspondence and enquiry.

The two matters were heard together

on 19 January, 1993.

The Court had before it the report

of an enquiry held by the

Disciplinary Committee on 7 July,

1992 and 4 August, 1992. The

Disciplinary Committee found that

the solicitor was guilty of

misconduct in that, inter alia:

• he delayed in the completion of

the administration of an estate,

• he failed to keep his client

adequately advised as to the

progress of the administration,

• he failed to attend meetings of

the Registrar's Committee of the

Society in relation to a complaint.

The Court accepted and incorporated

into its order an undertaking by the

solicitor, inter alia, not to practise save

as an assistant solicitor in the

employment of a solicitor of not less

than ten years standing approved by

the Society.

The Court also had before it the

report of the Disciplinary Committee

of an enquiry held on 7 July, 1992

and 4 August, 1992, in which the

Disciplinary Committee found that

the solicitor was guilty of conduct

tending to bring the profession into

disrepute in that, inter alia,