Previous Page  38 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

38

Country Site

Area

(ha)

Average

no of

visitors/

month

Yearly

total

Mean visit/ha

mangrove/yr

Source of data

Cameroon

Ebojie

Marine

turtle

200

10

120

0.6

Visit records kept by

Association Nationale de

Protection des Tortues

Marines du

Cameroun « Kud’A Tube »

Gabon NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

Congo

Mazra Club

Touristique

100

70

840

8.4

Mazra Club Touristique

records

DRC

Parc

Mangrove

500

7

84

0.168

Conservation Service of

Parc Mangrove Muanda

Total

800

87

1044

1.305

Tourism

Though there were a scarcity of data on

recreation value of mangroves, available

information indicate that mangroves of Central

Africa are also potential tourisms sites; receiving

on average 1,044 visitors per year (Table 16). In

the RoC, some 840 visitors were recorded in

the Mazra Club Touristique. These relatively low

numbers of visitors show thatmangroves are not

priority tourism areas for these countries, and

that terrestrial ecosystems such as rainforests or

other wildlife sanctuaries are bigger attractions.

Overall tourism numbers for these countries

are not readily available for each country.

Furthermore, some countries such as DRC

generally do not have highly developed tourism

industries due to political and infrastructural

challenges. Tourism infrastructure in the

mangroves of Central Africa is not yet fully

developed and the potential has not yet been

fully realized; especially given how globally

important these ecosystems are. Payments

for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes could

explore improving ecotourism opportunities

and income in the region.

Table 16: Tourist visits to mangrove sites within Central Africa

Additional and non-market ecosystem

services

In addition to the ecosystem services outlined

above, mangroves also provide additional

services, some of which are non-market values

that are more difficult to quantify in terms of

dollar value. For themangroves of Central Africa,

these include biodiversity and habitat benefits,

cultural services (spiritual values, recreational

values), services associated with water quality

maintenance, and services associated with

cycling of nutrients. Although these are all

probably highly valuable to the communities

living around the mangroves, they have not

been quantified for the purpose of this study

due to lack of data or lack of methodologies for

measuring them.