Previous Page  42 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

40

ACQ

Volume 13, Number 1 2011

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

selection of words to target in treatment given the lack of

evidence for generalisation. Consultation will also include full

disclosure to the client and communication partners about

the limits to the evidence that any therapy will work, the need

to rehearse to maintain any relearned vocabulary, the

eventual loss of learning with disease progression, and the

fact that the aim of therapy is to maintain current abilities or

slow decline, not return to previous levels of function.

Regular review

Some people with progressive aphasia have deteriorated

rapidly, within 1–2 years, while others maintained very good

communicative abilities over 8 or more years (Croot, 2009).

Therefore regular reviews will be essential, and it will be

important to discuss with the client the need to proactively

manage anticipated decline (Rogers & Alarcon, 1998).

Conclusion

Can your service offer an evidence-based approach to

intervention in progressive aphasia? In your view, the limited

empirical evidence suggests that intervention may be

appropriate. Hence you conclude that for each case you will

base your clinical decision-making on the combination of the

best currently available evidence, your own clinical expertise,

and the client’s values (Harasty, 2010).

References

Cartwright, J., & Elliott, K. A. E. (2009). Promoting strategic

television viewing in the context of progressive language

impairment.

Aphasiology, 23

(2), 266–285.

Cress, C. J., & King, J. M. (1999). AAC Strategies for

people with primary progressive aphasia without dementia:

Two case studies.

AAC Augmentative and Alternative

Communication

,

15

, 248–259.

Croot, K. (2009). Progressive aphasia: Definitions,

diagnoses, and prognoses.

Aphasiology,

23

(2), 302–326.

Croot, K., Nickels, L., Laurence, F., & Manning, M. (2009).

Impairment- and activity/participation-directed interventions

in progressive language impairment: Clinical and theoretical

issues.

Aphasiology

,

23

(2), 125–160.

Diehl, J., Mayer, T., Forstl, H., & Kurz, A.F. (2003). A

support group for patients with frontotemporal dementia.

Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and

Practice

,

2

(2), 151–161.

Harasty, J. (2010). What’s the evidence?

ACQuiring

Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing

,

12

(1), 42–44.

Henry, M.L., Beeson, P.M., & Rapcsak, S.Z. (2008a).

Treatment for anomia in semantic dementia.

Seminars in

Speech and Language

,

29

(1), 60–70.

Henry, M.L., Beeson, P.M., & Rapcsak, S.Z. (2008b).

Treatment for lexical retrieval in progressive aphasia.

Aphasiology

,

22

(7–8), 826–838.

Jokel, R., Cupit, J., Rochon, E., & Leonard, C. (2009).

Re-learning lost vocabulary in non-fluent progressive aphasia

with Mosstalk Words

®

.

Aphasiology

,

23

(2), 175–191.

Jokel, R., Rochon, E., & Anderson, N.D. (2010). Errorless

learning of computer-generated words in a patient with semantic

dementia.

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

,

20

(1), 16–41.

McNeil, M. R., & Duffy, J. R. (2001). Primary progressive

aphasia. In R. Chapey (Ed.),

Language intervention

strategies in adult aphasia

(4th ed., pp. 472–486). Baltimore:

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

McNeil, M. R., Small, S. L., Masterson, R. J., & Tepanta,

R. D. (1995). Behavioural and pharmacological treatment

of lexical-semantic deficits in a single patient with primary

progressive aphasia.

American Journal of Speech-Language

Pathology

,

4

, 76–93.

Newhart, M., Davis, C., Kannan, V., Heidler-Gary, J.,

Cloutman, L., & Hillis, A. E. (2009). Therapy for naming

deficits in two variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Aphasiology

,

23

(7–8), 823–834.

NHMRC (2009).

NHMRC additional levels of evidence and

grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines

.

Retrieved from

http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/

guidelines/final_draft_levels_and_grades_dec_09.pdf

O’Halloran, R., & Rose, T. (2010). What’s the evidence?

Communicatively accessible healthcare environments.

ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing

,

11

(3), 123–126.

Pattee, C., Von Berg, S., & Ghezzi, P. (2006). Effects of

alternative communication on the communicative effectiveness

of an individual with progressive language disorder.

International

Journal of Rehabilitation Research

,

29

, 151–153.

Rapp, B., & Glucroft, B. (2009). The benefits and protective

effects of behavioural treatment for dysgraphia in a case of

primary progressive aphasia.

Aphasiology

,

23

(2), 236–265.

Robinson, S., Druks, J., Hodges, J., & Garrard, P. (2009).

The treatment of object naming, definition, and object use in

semantic dementia: The effectiveness of errorless learning.

Aphasiology

,

23

(2), 175–191.

Rogalski, Y., & Edmonds, L. A. (2008). Attentive readings and

constrained summarization (ARCS) treatment in primary pro-

gressive aphasia: A case study.

Aphasiology

,

22

(7–8), 763–775.

Rogers, M. A., & Alarcon, N. B. (1998). Dissolution of spoken

language in primary progressive aphasia.

Aphasiology

,

12

(7/8), 635–650.

Rogers, M. A., King, J. M., & Alarcon, N. B. (2000). Proactive

management of primary progressive aphasia. In D. R.

Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.),

Augmentative

and alternative communication for adults with acquired

neurologic disorders

(pp. 305–337). Baltimore: Brookes.

Schneider, S. L., Thompson, C. K., & Luhring, B. (1996).

Effects of verbal plus gestural matrix training on sentence

production in a patient with primary progressive aphasia.

Aphasiology

,

10

, 297–317.

Tate, R.L., McDonals, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz,

R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality

of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing

the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale.

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

,

18

(4), 385–401.

Taylor, C., Miles-Kingma, R., Croot, K., & Nickels, L. (2009).

Speech pathology services for primary progressive aphasia:

Exploring an emerging area of practice.

Aphasiology

,

23

(2),

161–174.

Dr Karen Croot

is a lecturer in psychology at the University of Sydney

with teaching and research interests in speech and language production.

She has been researching progressive aphasia for over 15 years, and

recently co-edited with Lyndsey Nickels the first book on intervention

and management in progressive aphasia.

Cathleen Taylor

is Australia’s

leading speech pathologist clinician and researcher in the area of

progressive aphasia. She has established a specialist service for this

client group at War Memorial Hospital Waverley, and recently chaired

the 2010 Australian Aphasia Association Biennial National Conference,

where she for the first time introduced a session devoted to the

unique needs of people with progressive aphasia.

Professor

Lyndsey Nickels

is a research speech pathologist, currently an

NHMRC Senior Research Fellow and Professor at Macquarie

University. She has a long history of research into the nature of the

impairments in acquired language disorders and their treatment.

Correspondence to:

Dr Karen Croot

School of Psychology A18

University of Sydney, NSW Australia 2006

phone: +61 2 9869 4696

fax: +61 2 9356 5223

email:

karen.croot@sydney.edu.au