2 / 328
Expert Re
The mini
a.
The e
Final
b.
Gene
maki
appli
c.
The p
a div
analy
Selection
a.
AOAC
repor
b.
The O
c.
The O
neces
Award
An appro
Review
INTERNA
winning
apprecia
announc
2
view Pane
mum criteri
xpert revie
Action Meth
rally, some
ng the ERP
cability, criti
anel report
erse and/or
tical challen
Process:
staff lists
t to the Cha
MB Chair fo
MB select
sary, the O
priate lette
Panel. The
TIONAL ann
panel will
tion. The n
ement in th
2016 AO
EX
013 – 201
l of the Year
a for select
w panel mu
od, method
unique or
worthy of t
cal need, di
demonstrat
internation
ge.
all eligible
ir of the Off
rwards the
s the Expe
MB chair ma
r of apprec
winning pa
ual meetin
be acknow
ame of t
e
ILM
.
AC OFFICIA
CA
PERT REV
5 AOAC E
Award Info
ion are:
st have com
modificatio
particularly
he award,
fficult analy
es significa
al group of
panels for
icial Metho
list along w
rt Review P
y cast tie‐b
iation and t
nel will be
g, with pre
ledged at t
he winning
L METHO
NDIDATES
IEW PANE
XPERT REV
rmation
pleted a si
n) within th
noteworth
such as inn
sis, or timeli
nt merit as t
recognized
consideratio
ds Board (O
ith any supp
anel of the
reaking vote
hanks will b
announce
sentation o
he annual
ERP, with
DS BOARD
FOR
L OF THE Y
IEW PAN
gnificant m
e last three
y aspect of
ovative tech
ness.
o the scope
experts or
n and forw
MB).
orting infor
Year. Win
.
e sent to th
d at the a
f an award
meeting, re
supportin
AWARD
EAR
EL PROFIL
ilestone (e.g
years.
the ERP’s
nology or a
of the proj
an innovativ
ards that l
mation to th
ner is selec
e members
ppropriate
. All panelis
ceive an a
g story, w
S
ES
. First Actio
work is hig
pplication,
ect, the invo
e approach
ist along wi
e OMB.
ted by a 2
of the win
session of
ts participa
ward and
ill be carr
n Method,
hlighted as
breadth of
lvement of
to difficult
th the ERP
/3 vote. If
ning Expert
the AOAC
ting in the
a letter of
ied in the