32
M A R C H , 2 0 1 7
Keep your Association sharp –
in all seasons.
Value–Experience–Quality
Being prepared and responsive is what distinguishes our
firm. We strive to solve the problem–resolve the issue
and make life easier for our Associations and their
property managers.
Hueston McNulty, P.C.
Association General Counsel and Experienced Trial Attorneys
Samuel J. McNulty, Esq.
smcnulty@huestonmcnulty.com /www.huestonmcnulty.comTel: 973-377-0200 / Fax: 973-377-6328
Offices: Florham Park, NJ; Toms River, NJ; Blue Bell, PA; and New York, NY
HML-4337 CAI Dec 2013_1/2 pg vertical 11/22/13 10:48 AM Page 1
control of any aspect of the financial
process. In this case, someone else
should have been reconciling the
account monthly and reviewing any
anomalies. Additionally, the entire
board should have had access to the
reconciliations since the entire board
has the fiduciary duty to act in the best
interest of the association.
“Bidding Your Money Adieu“
Situation:
The association did not
have a set bidding policy, and as a
result, for a significant HVAC improve-
ment, the in-house property manager
had no responsibility to acquire mul-
tiple bids for such a large scope of
work. As a result, the manager gave
the work to a HVAC Company that
he knew quite well for a cost well in
excess of the anticipated replacement
cost from the association’s replacement
study. After the work was complete, the
association paid out the vendor in line
with their contract. Upon receiving
the payment from the association, the
HVAC vendor provided a substantial
gift to the property manager.
How the Fraud was Perpetrated:
Lack of a proper bidding policy
allowed the property manager to uni-
laterally assign a major contract to a
vendor without board approval.
Clue:
When we, as auditors, began
to conduct our fieldwork, we noted a
major expense which did not appear
to have any type of recognition at a
board meeting, or other board approv-
al before the project took place.
Detection Method:
As part of the
audit procedures we review all the
available board minutes and contract
related to major projects to ensure
that a proper bidding process was
followed. Once we noted that the
board did not obtain multiple bids
for the work, we brought that to the
attention of the board. It was not until
sometime later that the kickback to the
property manager came to light.
Recommendation:
A system of checks
and balances should be in place so
one person does not have unilateral
control of any aspect of the financial
process. In this case, someone else
should have been reconciling the
account monthly and reviewing any
anomalies. Additionally, the entire
board should have had access to the
reconciliations since the entire board
FRAUD...
from page 30.