Previous Page  28 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Predictors of

immunotherapy response

in lung cancer: biomarkers,

mutational load and

tumour biology

Roy S. Herbst MD, PhD,

Ensign Professor of

Medicine and Chief of

Medical Oncology at

the Yale Cancer Center

and Smilow Cancer

Hospital in New Haven,

Connecticut, speaks with Dr Farzanna

Haffizulla on immunotherapy for lung

cancer and advances in biomarker

studies.

Dr Haffizulla:

We know that immunotherapy

agents have truly come of age in lung cancer.

What is your opinion about the advances in

biomarker studies?

Dr Herbst:

Immunotherapy clearly has become

a new modality for treating lung cancer, just

like chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and tar-

geted therapy. The question now is how can

we benefit more patients. We know that 1 out

of 4, 1 out of 5 patients has a truly remarka-

ble outcome, but the remainder don’t, so we

need to develop newer and better biomark-

ers. We’re doing that. There’s PD-L1, which

gives an okay, not great biomarker.

Some studies, including one that I led with

pembrolizumab, do clearly show that higher

levels of PD-L1 do predict a better outcome,

so I think that PD-L1 will be used in some

settings. But what is also known is some

patients who don’t have any PD-L1 on their

tumour, still do have benefit, so it’s not the

whole story. Now what’s being done is immu-

no-sequencing, meaning people are looking

at tumours, sequencing those tumours, either

looking at either the number of mutations,

or the quality of the mutations, meaning is

there a specific mutation. I think those signa-

tures might be important, and then remember

there’s another part of the whole component.

It’s not enough to have a tumour that’s driv-

ing the process. You have to have the immune

system at the tumour. So, is the tumour

becoming inflamed and are the immune cells

coming to the tumour? I think both are being

looked at right now.

Dr Haffizulla:

The PD-L1 status itself, would

you consider that a dynamic biomarker? And

you mentioned the tumour infiltrating lym-

phocytes themselves, and how they stain, and

how quickly you’re able to get that particular

specimen stained in the right fashion, and

how old that particular specimen is.

Dr Herbst:

You bring up some good points.

It’s the interferon that stimulates the whole

process. It’s a real time marker, so archival

biopsies have their limits, so we’re going to

need to really cast a wide net here. Look at

signatures in the tumour, look at signatures

in lymphocytes, look at blood-based markers,

and all that’s being done, and we’re seeing

that in the literature now, and it’s a very big

area of research. We’re doing that in our own

group at Yale on a daily basis.

Dr Haffizulla:

Still on the immunology thread

here. What is your opinion of some of the

immunologic biomarkers and immune neoan-

tigen signatures, and looking at the mutational

load of the tumour itself? How does that play

in, and I know that we want to get as detailed

as possible, but I know that there is also a

progression of change that happens with the

tumour as it’s being treated. So, how does

that all play in?

Dr Herbst:

Well, you know, mutational load

certainly plays a role. Actually, if you look,

it’s really smoking. It’s patients who smoke

that tend to have a better outcome proba-

bly because they have more mutations. So, I

think mutational load can be a guide. I don’t

think it’s the whole story. We are going to

have to look at exactly what mutations are

there. Are there specific neoantigens? One

way we’re trying to figure this out at Yale is

we have a re-biopsy protocol as part of lung

SPORE grant, where we have patients who

get a biopsy before they’re treated, and then

they’re treated with an immune therapy.

Then, if they become resistant, we get a sec-

ond biopsy. The reason why that’s important

is then we can compare the genetic profile

before and after in the same patient. So, you

remove some of the noise that you see when

you check between patients, and try and iden-

tify what’s gained, what’s lost from the tumour

when it becomes resistant. These types of

studies are happening at many places now.

There’s so much we know, but there’s even

more we don’t know and I think this is an

Go to

practiceupdate.com

to watch the

full video

interview with

Roy S. Herbst.

LUNG

28

PRACTICEUPDATE HAEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY