![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0410.jpg)
400
Wiley IFRS: Practical Implementation Guide and Workbook
(c) Monte-Carlo model.
(d) Intrinsic value.
Answer: (d)
9. Ashleigh, a public limited company, has granted
share options to its employees with a fair value of $6
million. The options vest in three years' time. The
Monte-Carlo model was used to value the options,
and these estimates had been made:
• Grant date (January
I .
20X4): estimate of em–
ployees leaving the entity during the vesting
period-S%
• January I, 20XS: revision of estimate of em–
ployees leaving to 6% before vesting date
• December 3 1, 20X6: actual employees leaving
S%
A. What would be the expense charged in the
income statement in
Year to December 3 1. 20X4 ?
(a) $6 million.
(b) $2 million.
(c) $1.90 million.
(d) $S.70 million.
Answer: (c) ($6 mill ion x 95% x 1/3)
B. Year to December 31. 20XS?
(a) $1.90 million.
(b) $1.88 million.
(c) $2 million.
(d) $3.78 million.
Answe r : (b) ($6 mill ion x 94% x 2/3 - $1.90
million)
C.
Year to Decembe r 31. 20X6?
(a) $1.90 million.
(b) $1.88 million.
(c) $2 million.
(d) $1.92 million.
Answer : (d) ($6 mill ion x 95% - $3.78 million)
10. Joice. a public limited company. has granted
share options to its employees prior to the date from
which IFRS 2 became applicable (November 7.
2002). The company decided after the issuance of
IFRS 2 to reprice the options. The original exercise
price of $20 was repriced at $ IS per option. IFRS 2
would require the company to
(a) Apply the Standard to the share options
from the original grant date and ignore the
repricing.
(b) Apply the Standard to the share options
from the original grant date. taking into ac–
count the repriced award.
(c) Apply the Standard to the repriced award
only.
(d) Ignore the Standard for the whole award of
share options.
Answer: (c)
11. An entity has granted share options to its em–
ployees. The total expense to the vesting date of De–
cember 31, 20X6. has been calculated as $8 million.
The entity has decided to settle the award early. on
December 3 1. 20XS. The expense charged in the in–
come statement since the grant date of January I.
20X3 . had been year to December 3 1. 20X3. $2 mil–
lion, and year to December 3 1. 20X4. $2.1 million.
The expense that would have been charged in the year
to December 3 1. 20XS. was $2.2 million. What would
be the expense charged in the income statement for
the year December 3 1. 20XS?
(a) $2.2 million.
(b) $8 million.
(c) $3.9 million.
(d) $2 million.
Answer: (c)
12. Elizabeth. a public limited company. has granted
100 share appreciation rights to each of its 1.000 em–
ployees in Janu ary 20X4. The management feels that
as of December 31, 20X4. 90% of the awards will
vest on Decemb er 3 1. 20X6. The fair value of each
share appreciation right on December 3 1. 20X4. is
$ 10. What is the fair value of the liability to be re–
corded in the financial statements for the year ended
December 3 1, 20X4?
(a) $300.000
(b) $ 10 million
(c) $ 100.000
(d) $90.000
Answer: (a) (100 x 1000 x 90% x $10 x 1/3)
13. Jay. a public limited company, has granted 20
share appreciation rights to each of its SODemployees
on January I. 20X4. The rights are due to vest on
December 31. 20X7, with payment being made on
December 3 1. 20X8. Assume that 80% of the awards
vest. Share prices are
s
January I 20X4
IS
December 31. 20X4
18
December 31. 20X7
21
December 3 1. 20X8
19
What liability will be recorded on December 31.
20X7. for the share appreciation rights?
(a) $ 60.000
(b) $210.000
(c) $ 48.000
(d) $ IS0.000
Answer: (c) [20 x 500 x 80% x ($21 - $15)]
14. How should the settlement of the transaction be
accounted for on December 3 1. 20X8?
(a) Payment to employees of $32.000. no gain
recorded.
(b) Payment to employees of $ 16.000. gain of
$32.000 is recorded.
(c) Payment to employees of $48.000. no gain
recorded.
(d) Payment to employees of $32.000, gain of
$ 16.000 is recorded.
Answer: (d) [20 x 500 x 80% x ($19 - $15)] th at
is, $32,000
15. Doc. a public limited company. has purchased
inventory of $ 100,000. The company has offered the
supplier a choice of settlement alternatives. The alter-