Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  413 / 488 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 413 / 488 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter

34 /

Share-Based Payments (l FRS 2)

natives are either receiving 1,000 shares of Doc six

months after the purchase date (valued at $ 110,000 at

the date of purchase) or receiv ing a cash payment

equal to the fair value of 800 shares as of Decem–

ber3 l, 20X4 (estimated value $90,000 at the date of

purchase). What should be the accounting entry at the

date of purchase of the inventory?

(a) Inventory $90,000, liability $90,000.

(b) Inventory $100,000 , liability $ 100,000.

(c) Inventory $ 100,000, liability $ 110,000, in–

tangible asset $10,000.

(d) Inventory $100,000, liability $90,000, equity

$ 10,000.

Answer: (d)

16.A.

In the tax jurisdiction of Mack, a public

limited company, a tax deduction is allowed for the

intrinsic value of the share options issued to

employees. The company issued options on January

I, 20X4, worth $ 15 million to employees. They vest

in three years. The share options' intrinsic value at

December 3 1, 20X4, was $ 12 million. The tax rate in

the jurisdiction is 30%. What is the tax effect of the

above issue of share options at December 3 1, 20X4?

(a) $ 1.5 million benefit to income statement.

(b) $ 1.2 million benefit to income statement.

(c) $ 1.5 million benefit recognized in equity.

(d) $ 1.2 million benefit recognized in equity.

Answer: (b) At December 31, 20X4, 30% of $12

milli on di vided by three yea rs

=

$ 1.2 million to

income sta tement as the ta x effect of th e cumula–

tive remuner ation expense exceed s th e tax benefit

($5 mill ion

@

30% compa r ed with $4 million

@

30 % ).

B. In the above example, what would be the tax

effect if the intrinsic value at December 3 1, 20X4,

was $21 million?

(a) $2. 1 million tax benefit to income.

(b) $2.1 million recognized in equity.

(c) $ 1.5 million tax benefit to income, $0.6 mil–

lion recognized in equity.

(d) $ 1.5 million recognized in equity, $0.6 mil-

lion tax benefit to income.

Answer: (c) A portion of the ta x ben efit is r ecog–

nized in equity as the tax ben efit of $21 milli on x

1/3 x 30% ($2.1 million), exceeds the tax effect of

the accumulated remunera tion expense $15 million

x 1/3 x 30% ($1.5 million).

401