GAZETTE
MARCH 1984
- Speed: knot.
- Power: horsepower: (There is an exception in
relation to excise duty on mechanically propelled
vehicles).
- Temperature: fahrenheit.
Other less common and more technical units of
measurement are also withdrawn from use. The
outlawing of the use of these units of measurement should
have consequences in "most fields of human activity", to
quote the Directive."
Exceptions
There are certain exceptions to the general illegality of
using the withdrawn units of measurement:
(a) Agreement
In any particular transaction it is not unlawful to
use any unit of measurement which was hitherto
customarily used in trade in like transactions, but
only where there is agreement between the parties
to the transaction. However, this exception does not
apply to retail transactions or transactions relating
to packaged goods where an unauthorised unit of
measurement is used without its metric equivalent.
Almost all goods manufactured for eventual retail
sale will, therefore, not come within this exception.
(b) Supplemental Indications
A unit of measurement no longer authorised may
still be used as a supplementary indication of
quantity expressed in an authorised unit
provided: —
- Firstly, that the indication in the authorised unit
predominates and the supplemental indication
be expressed in characters no larger than those of
the corresponding indication in the authorised
unit: and
- Secondly, that in the case of conflict the supple-
mentary indication will be disregarded.
Although the goods of many manufacturers and
distributors already come within the exception,
those of many more do not. Even a narrow interpre-
tation of the first condition of this exception would
suggest that the metric indication must at least come
before the outlawed imperial indication.
(c) Products already on the Market
A unit of measurement which has become
unauthorised under the Regulations may continue
to be used in relation to products and equipment
already on the market or in service on November
1st, 1983. Similarily, an unauthorised unit may
continue to be used in relation to parts and
components necessary to supplement or replace
parts or components of such products and
equipment already on the market on November 1st,
1983.
Consequences of Contravention of the Regulations
(a) Criminal Offence
Any person who uses a unit of measurement in contra-
vention of the Regulations commits an offence and is
laible to a fine not exceeding £800. However, it is
suggested (and this is confirmed by personnel in the
relevant Government Department) that there is unlikely
to be vigorous or widespread prosecution, at least until
the business community has had a reasonable time to
implement the provisions of the Regulations.
(b) Effect on Contracts
(i) Contracts entered into prior to November 1983.
Where a contract was entered into prior to
November 1983 and falls to be performed or partly
performed after that date, any reference to a unit
withdrawn from use shall be deemed to be a
reference to its metric equivalent (set out in
Schedule 4). Therefore, any calculation under the
contract shall be made by reference to that metric
equivalent.
(ii) Contracts entered into after November 1983.
Although not altogether clear, the effect of the
Regulations on contracts entered into after November,
1983, would seem to be simply that, subject to the
exceptions mentioned above, contracts must now refer to
the metric unit where the non-metric unit that would
otherwise have been used has been outlawed. The
consequence of not so doing is that an offence is
committed, as explained above. In fact, Regulation 8
specifically provides that Section 19 of the 1878 Act shall
cease to have effect in so far as it makes void a transaction
not made according to the (imperial) weights and
measures to which the Section refers.
However, although surely entirely unintentional, an
unusual result is achieved when one considers, together,
both Regulation 12 of the present Regulations and
Section 76 of the 1878 Act. Section 76 is the first section of
that Part of the Act entitled "Application of Act to
Ireland", and deals only with transactions determined
according to the weight of goods. Section 76 provides that
any contract, bargain, sale or dealing for any quantity of
any commodity sold, delivered or agreed for by weight
will be void if not made according to the various
denominations of imperial weight set out therein.
Regulation 12 (2) provides that any reference in any
other enactment to a unit of measurement no longer
authorised will be construed as a reference to its metric
equivalent. I would suggest, therefore, that Section 76
now makes void any contract for goods which are to be
determined by weight if it refers only to a non-metric unit
of weight which is now outlawed (e.g. stone, hundred-
weight, ton, etc.,) and not its metric equivalent.
This result can only be avoided by specific agreement
between the parties in accordance with the exception
explained at 2 (a) above. However, such an agreement
cannot be made where the transaction relates to packaged
goods or is a retail transaction. An example may help to
explain:— A contract entered into after 1st November,
1983, for the supply of 100 tons of fertiliser to be delivered
in bags of 2 hundredweight each would, in my view, be
unavoidably void.
Application of the Regulations
The Regulations have very broad application, it being
provided that they apply to "measuring instruments used,
measurements made and dimensions or quantities
expressed in units, whether for trade or for any economic,
public health, public safety or administrative purpose".
The Regulations do not affect the use of units of measure-
ment in air, sea, or rail transport, which are not
authorised in the Regulations but which have been
38




