Previous Page  396 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 396 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

if the Minister for Justice failed to make adequate

revisions of the scale of fees.

It was felt that under the present system the

fees paid to defending counsel were unreasonable.

At present senior counsel in a murder trial are

paid 30 guineas on the brief and 12 guineas for

every subsequent day; junior counsel are paid

two-thirds of this, or if appearing without senior,

then 25 guineas. In all other cases senior are paid

15 guineas and 10 guineas refresher; juniors are

paid 10 guineas and seven refresher. If the judge

allows it, they can receive an additional maximum

of 10 guineas for advising proofs. This is a dis

cretion which judges exercise differently; some

only allow four guineas while others sometimes

give the maximum. The fees do not make any

allowance for travelling to the Circuit Courts, nor

do they take into account the number of appear

ances a barrister may make. One barrister said he

had travelled seven times to a court in Wexford

on a legal case and his fees were 10 guineas, and

whatever the judge allowed for proofs.

In Northern Ireland a distinction

is drawn

between murder and other offences. There the fees

in a murder trial are between 100 and 300 guineas

for senior counsel, and between 40 and 75 guineas

fresher. In other cases they get between 50 and

100 guineas, and between 25 and 50 guineas

refresher. In other cases they get between 50 and

are paid between 25 and 35 guineas. But the

English system makes even further distinctions.

If a person pleads guilty to murder then senior is

paid 80, while the junior gets 50 guineas if he is

on his own. For a trial the fees are between 80

and 150 guineas. In other cases it is between 40

and 100 guineas.

EXPERIMENTAL BASIS

In the estimates for the appropriate accounts

£20,000 was allowed for legal aid cases in

1967/

'68. For the following year 1968/'69 the figure

dropped to £16,000. But the actual sum expended

last year was only £9,289 which includes solicitors'

and witnesses' fees. It is estimated that not more

than £5,000 was paid to barristers. In the same

year a sum of £11,934 was spent on commissions

and inquiries. The figure for this year's commis

sions and inquiries will inevitably be far in excess

of last year's figures.

The scheme began in 1965, and the scale should

have been reviewed

in 1967 but the Minister

claimed that the trial period was three years and

not two. The Bar, though they disagreed about the

length of the trial period, operated the system for

a further year. Towards the end of that year the

Council recommended that fees should be on a

parity with prosecution fees. The matter was then

put under

' Ministerial consideration', and the

consideration apparently took a further two-and-

a-half years. At a meting between the Minister and

a deputation from the Bar Council, the Minister

informed the Council that in agreement with the

Minister for Finance he would grant an increase

of 25% and 3 guineas for consultation.

PUBLIC MONEY

If the Bar withdrew from the system then they

will revert to the old system of defending criminals

without charge. Prior to the introduction of legal

aid criminals were always given full representation

by both solicitors and barristers.

At the same time the State prosecutors were

being paid out of public money. It is the difference

between fees paid to State counsel and those paid

to defending counsel that has led to the present

claim. The Bar claim that defence counsel should

be paid the same fee as State counsel, and that

there is no principle which justifies the defence

counsel being paid less than the prosecution. In

particular they point out that there is a far greater

responsibility on the counsel for the defence. They

also point out that the present scheme fails to

include such matters as applications for bail, or

the appearance of a senior counsel in the district

court for the preliminary investigation. It is known

that under the present scheme many people are

obtaining legal aid when they have sufficient funds

to pay for a defence.—

Irish Times,

17 February,

.1970.

LEYDEN — AMSTERDAM — COLUMBIA

SUMMER PROGRAMME IN AMERICAN

LAW

The Columbia University in the City of New

York, the University of Leyden and the University

of Amsterdam organise a yearly summer course in

American Law since 1963. The 1970 session will

be held in Leyden from June 29th to July 24th

110