Previous Page  414 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 414 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

competent graduates in the Universities into

such problems was considerably overdue.

The lecturer next considered how successful

solicitors were in achieving the ends of justice.

It seemed to him that few solicitors would give

advice at a price the ordinary litigant could afford

to pay. Due to this factor, a great majority of the

population have had little contact with Solicitors.

It would seem that this state of affairs will have to

change radically as a tendency towards litigation is

bound to increase in the future. A more ambitious

legal aid scheme is bound to develop gradually.

It is also important to note that in future solicitors

will be concerned more and more to defend the

rights of the citizens against the State. In order to

achieve this, it is essential that solicitors should

achieve a degree of economic independence where

they can speak their minds openly in Court with

out fear or favour. The solicitors must therefore

provide an efficient service in the future.

PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE

SOLICITORS ACTS

John R. Colfer

By Order of the High Court dated 20th March,

1970 it was directed that the above named

Solicitor who practices as Colfer Son & Poyntz,

New Ross, Co. Wexford be struck off the roll. It

was also directed that no payment should be made

from any bank account of the Solicitor or his

firm without permission of the Court. Subsequent

orders were made suspending the operation of the

order striking off the Solicitor and that matter

stands adjourned. The freezing order is in opera

tion subject to orders subsequently made authoris

ing payment of certain cheques and any further

orders which may be made to the same effect.

REGISTRATION

OF TITLE ACT, 1964

Issue of New Land Certificate

Applications have been received from the registered

owners mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto, for

the issue of Certificates of Title in substitution for the

original Certificates issued in respect of the lands speci

fied in the said Schedule, which original Certificates, it

is alleged, have been lost or inadvertently destroyed.

A new Certificate will be issued in each case, except

in respect of which notification is received in this

Registry within 28 days from the publication of this

notice, that the Certificate of Title is still in existence,

and in the custody of some person other than the

registered owner. Any such notification should state the

grounds on which such Certificate is being held.

Dated the 21st day of April, 1970.

D. L. McALLISTER,

Registrar of Titles.

Central Office,

Land Registry,

Chancery Street,

Dublin.

SCHEDULE

1. Registered Owner,

Michael Guideia and James

Gnideia.

Folio number 5371. County Tipperary. Lands

of Gortnagowna, in the Barony of Shenin, containing

36a. Or. 9p.

2. Registered Owner,

Margaret Lyons.

Folio numbers

21742 and 21786. Lands of Abbeyquarter, Hazelhill, Co.

Mayo, containing Oa. Or. 15Jp. and Oa. Or. 27p.

3. Registered Owner,

Michael Duvy.

Folio number

2205. County Monaghan. Lands of Formil, containing

9a. Or. 36p.

SOLICITORS

ASKED TO FORM A

TRADE

UNION

The Sunday and daily newspapers during the

Easter weekend, March 29th-30th, carried an

nouncements for a proposal for a trade union

known as Comhar na nAturnaetha (the Solicitors'

Union) which, as published, contained contra

dictory information. It was stated that of 1,400

solicitors throughout the country who were can

vassed an estimated 73 per cent were in favour

of forming a union and that the Incorporated

Law Society had recently hinted that the time

had come for solicitors to form their own union.

The press announcements were followed by a

circular letter dated 30th March 1970 issued to a

number of solicitors over the names of Mr.

Thomas K. Smith, President and Mr. Michael B.

O'Maoileoin, Secretary of the Union inviting

them to join it and to pay a subscription of £20.

The information contained in the press statements

was incorrect in that the Law Society had never

been consulted, had never been aware of the

proposed union and had never suggested that a

union was necccsary or desirable. Enquiries made

by the Society failed to discover that any survey

of the profession was made.

The President of the Society, Mr. James R. C.

Green issued a press release followed by a cir

cular to the profession stating these facts.

Mr. Donal T. McAuliffe and Mr. Michael

Kelly who were named in the circular letter of

March 30th as trustees of the union have written

to the Secretary of the union requesting that their

names be withdrawn and they have asked the

Council of the Law Society to inform the pro

fession that they are not trustees and have no

128