Previous Page  521 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 521 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

Section 55 of this Act shall not be payable

(a)

in

respect of the refusal of permission for any dveelopment

that consists of or includes the making of any material

change in the use of any structures or other land" but

the definition section by providing that "use in relation

to land does not include the use of the land by the

carrying out of any work

thereon"

limits

the wide

language of paragraph a. Compensation is not payable

if permission is refused because of a deficiency in water

supplies or sewerage nor is it payable in eight other

cases defined in the sub-section. This sub-section is a

good example of the complexity of modern legislation;

it consists of one sentence containing

(if one treats

numerals as words) 644 words so

that it is easy to

forget the beginning of it before one reaches the end.

Section 58 gives

the Minister power

to

allow

the

payment of

compensation when

sub-section

(1)

of

sections 56 or sections 57 would nrevent this if he is

satisfied that it would not be just and reasonable

to

refuse compensation because of

those provisions.

If

agreement cannot be

reached about

the amount of

compensation,

it

is

to be determined bv arbitration

under the Act of 1919 as if the claim arose in relation

to compulsory acquisition of land and the rules in that

Act

in

relation

to

assessment of compensation are

altered.

An apDlication to the Court for an extension of time

within which to make a claim for compensation under

Part VI of the Act, shall be commenced by the issue of

a Notice of Motion, which shall be in accordance with

Form 2 in the Schedule of TWms to this Order, or such

modification thereof as may be appropriate, and shall

be called an action. The applicant shall e the "laintiff

and the nlanning Authoritv shall be the resDondent.

The Notices of Motion under Part VI in accordance

with Form 2 shall be served before thev are filed. In

the Dublin Circuit onlv, every notice of motion, duly

signed by the solicitor shall state the date upon which

it is desired that the action shall be listed for hearing,

and shall be filed bv the oaintiff in the Circuit Court

Office at

least 21

davs before

the hearing;

in

the

country, the date of the commencement of the sittings

s'lall

be

inserted

instead. When

filed,

the County

Registrar shall enter the Notice of Motion for hearing.

Every notice of Motion shal be filed within seven davs

of service on the nlanning authority, who shall themselves

file a notice, if none is served on them any nlannine

authority wishes to dispute the ^laintiff's claim, he shall

within 10 davs of service, service on the Dlaintiff. a

Hffence in accordance with Form 7. Save bv snerial leave

of the Court, every action under this Act shall be heard

upon oral evidence.

Landlord and Tenant (Ground Rents) Act 1967

Section 22 of the Act provides that an anneal shall

lie to the Circuit Court against any award, order, or

other decision of a County Registrar! in an arbitration

under this Act. Instead of deciding the issue, the Court

may

remit the matter back

to

the original County

Registrar or to another Counv Registrar. An award or

order of the County Regitrar may be enforced as a

judgment, by leave of the Court.

All previous notices served or proceedings taken shall

be valid.

An appeal

to

the Circuit Court under section 22

shall be undertaken bv Notice, of Motion, whirk shall

be called an action, and shall broadlv be in

'anco

with Form 1 of the Schedule of Forms. The appellant

shall be the olaintiff, and the other party be the arbitra

tion shall be

the respondent. The appeal shall state

whether it is from the whole or oarf; of an award or

order.

The rules as to serving and filing are identical with

those under

the Local Government

(Planning and

Development) Act 1963. A copy certified bv the County

Registrar of any award or order appealed from shall be

produced to the Court by the nlaintiff upon the hearing

of the action.

TRANSPORT AND AGRICULTURAL LAW OF

THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

Senator Professor Mary Bourke and Mr. Gavan Duffy

represented Irish lawyers at a colloquium under the

auspices of the British Institute of International Law

and of the European Association of Jurists held in the

De Vere Hotel, Kensington, London, from 24th to 26th

March 1970.

Apart from talks in English by Lord Woolley, former

President of the British National Farmers Union, and

Mr. Maes, Research Fellow at the British Institute, all

other lectures were delivered in French by Maitre Louis

Pettiti. Secretary-General of the European Association

of Jurists, Professor Magioux of Paris, Maitre Malezieux,

Maitre Lagarde (Rouen), Maitre Dupuy (Secretary of

the French Agricultural Credit Movement), and Mon

sieur Megret. It was unfortunate that full texts of these

lectures were subsequently not available.

The following would appear to be amongst the most

important points stressed :

1. There will be a tendency to harmonise the law

in the countries of the Community as regards farm

improvements, rights of preference

to purchase

land for young farmers, and imposition of agri

cultural levies.

2. It is intended eventually that there should be a

common agricultural and transport policy in all

the countries of the European Community; it is

only in the realms of agriculture and of trans

port that the Treaty of Rome provides for this.

3. Much of

the future plans for agriculture and

transport in the Community have been stressed in

the Mansholt and Pisani Reports.

4. The countries that endeavour to gain advantages

in their exports in agriculture at the expense of

other countries in the Community will be liable

to heavy penalties imposed by the European Com

mission in Brussels.

5. There will be an inevitable rise in food prices in

most commodities, and

this increase will weigh

hard on the poorer section of the Community. If

market prices are higher, it is unlikely that the

farmers will be better off.

6. The present situation of European agriculture is

unfavourable, and the negotiation of international

commodity agreements would appear to be essen

tial.

7. There

is a surplus of 250,000 cows

in Europe

now, but it is suggested they could be used to feed

under-developed countries.

8. It will be necessary to provide emigrant agri

cultural workers with the same social security