Previous Page  544 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 544 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

"units of account"

(about £250,000). Judicial

control, as has been mentioned, will be vested in

the Court of Justice of the European Communi

ties. For tax purposes, however, it is proposed

that the S.E. is to be deemed to have its head

quarters at the place from which it is managed

(presumably within the Common Market).

As in the case of most European Company laws,

the S.E. will have (1) a board of management,

(2) a supervisory board, and (3) a general meeting

of shareholders. Independent rules will probably

secure the workers' rights of participation in the

supervisory board (in

line with well-established

German

Mitbestimmung—

company law practice).

So far the S.E. is still in the planning stage.

European Companies, as such, exist only on paper.

It will remain to be seen which, and how many,

companies will avail themselves of the opportu

nities thus offered. (The present writer is of the

opinion that S.E.s will become the routine com

mon form of European Companies of the future.)

The possible entry of Ireland, Britain and others

into the Common Market will bring new prob

lems with them—firstly, as English (and Irish)

law is based on different principles (the "common

law") to the laws of the present member States of

the Common Market (the "civil law"); secondly,

to close on a topical note—relevant to the recent

takeover of Autozero by the (British) Transport

Development Group, and

to

the Roadstone-

Cement merger—because of

the Government's

statement

(The Irish Times, 2

September 1970)

that the Government

"note with satisfaction

that

these two companies (Roadstone and Cement) ...

will remain in Irish ownership and under Irish

control" (italics mine).

But see how carefully-worded that statement

is : we have a Government which clearly antici

pates the difficulties of getting through the long

hall and through the little door like that through

which Alice found herself looking, to the loveliest

garden you ever saw,

the European Common

Market.

This is the light that has been kindled here,

A hope to man through half a hemisphere,

Hope that is brightness in earth's darkest day,

A glorious gift for guests to take away.

John Masefield

(after the Congress of The Hague, 1948).

Bibliography

1.

Proposition dc

la Commission au Conseil

re

Societe Anonyme Europeenne.

(24 June 1970).

(COM. (70) 600 Final PTS 1, 2 and 3).

2.

Contribution a I'etude des modes de represen

tation des interets des travailleurs dans le cadre

des societes anonymes europeennes par Ad. le

professeur Gerard Lyon-Caen, professeur a

la

faculte de droit et des sciences economiques de

Paris.

(EEC Etude Serie Concurrence—No. 10,

1970—8278).

3.

Projet d'un statut des societes anonymes euro

peennes par M. le professeur Pieter Sanders,

doyen de

la faculte de droit de Rotterdam.

(EEC Etude Serie Concurrence—No. 6, 1967—

8213).

4. The "Werner Plan" for a total monetary union

Agencc International d'information pour la

presse,

No. 566, 10 March 1970.

5. "The Proposal for a European Company" by

Dennis Thompson (P.E.P., December 1969).

DUBLIN CONFERENCE ON LEGISLATION

OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Parti

The need for more democratic control in the

Common Market was stressed by several speakers

at the International Legal Conference on

the

Expansion of the European Communities, opened

by

the Taoiseach, Mr. Lynch,

in Dublin on

October 2.

Although

the conference, organised by

the

British Institute of International and Comparative

Law, is essentially a legal affair—the delegates

being lawyers from European countries—many of

the topics covered have a strong political content

and are of considerable general

interest and

importance.

Speaking on community legislation, Herr Arved

Deringer, of Germany, a former member of the

European Parliament, said the near absence of a

separation of powers in the Community institu

tions was very dangerous in the long run. The

Council of Ministers met in secret and took deci

sions in secret. Yet they were a legislative body

making laws. The ambiguous character of

the

Council meant it was still a diplomatic conference,

which was not bound by any decision of a national

parliament.

He said the secrecy of the Council's meetings

meant that many people had the impression that

things were being decided in Brussels, when they

knew neither who was deciding, nor why.

Herr Deringer said that two basic principles of

democracy were that those who paid should have

88