Previous Page  640 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 640 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

explaining the facts simply. There is excellent

background information as to the origins of the

European Movement. It is emphasised that the

Community is an integration and harmonization

of six National economic programmes. It must

be stressed that the Treaty of Rome is for an un

limited period, and it is understood that in the

event of dissent, certain concessions would be

made to the Community spirit by members. It

must be remembered that the Community and its

Institutions — Commision, Court, European

Parliament — were established as independant

organisations free from direct national interfer

ence. Apart from the Treaty of Rome itself, there

are numerous regulations and references to named

commodities. Even when the Investment Bank

was set up, certain financial concessions were

made; then there is the Development Fund to

aid overseas territories. The European

Commission is already responsible for over 1,000

decisions. The Commission of 14 members has

8,000 civil servants, and about 40 Commissions.

The real work of the European Parliament is done

in its 10 Committees. The European Court has

automatic and compulsory jurisdiction within its

sphere of activities and Community law. A

detailed description of the personnel of tne

Commission and of the Court is given. It is

stressed that EFTA differs from the Community

inasmuch as there is no mention of any non-

economic objective, nor of any proposition to

achieve a common policy as between the member

states themselves. The volume is well illustrated

by simple statistics and well worth reading.

C.G.D.

Annual Survey of Commonwealth Law,

1968.

8vo; pp. 855. (London, Butterworth,

1969. £8-8-0).

This is the Fourth Volume in this series

published by Butterworths. It is an interesting,

indeed an exciting series. It shows the straight

and unerring vitality of the Common Law

Tradition. The Common Law ensures uniformity

in diverse political and social conditions as far

apart as Australia and India. This book reflects

how little political difficulties affect the flowing

development of Law in the Commonwealth in

1968.

Its twenty essays cover almost all branches of

law — Constitutional, Administrative, Criminal,

Tort, Contract, Property, Commercial, Company,

Taxation, Labour, International Law etc. The

Contributors include such well known names as

G. H. Treitel, Paul O'Higgins and E. R. Hardy

Ivany and therefore the standard is exceptionally

high.

The book is of considerable Irish interest and

relevance as we are members of the Legal (if not

political) commonwealth family. Reference is

made to a considerable number of Irish cases

both North and South of the Border. On the

question of Automism in Criminal Law,

Brutty

v. A.G. for N.I.

(1963 A.C. 386) is considered—

also on the nature of satisfying evidence. On

criminal evidence the

People v. O'Brien, and The

People v. Crosbie,

are also mentioned. The

Supreme Court decision on Bail of

A. G. v.

O'Callaghan

(1967 I.LTR45) is considered at

length, it being pointed out that not all Courts

take so liberal a view, even if similar views are

formed in Australia

(Reg. v. Mahoney-Smith

1967 A.L154) and Ceylon

(Permasivi v. A.G.

(1967) 73CLW 66). In view of the ramblings of

Legislative amendment the provision of S.I8 of

the English Criminal Justice Acts

1967 is

relevant. In the chapter on Judicial Developments

Budd J's decision of

Cahill v. Irish Motor

Traders' Association

is considered at some

length.

I have said enough to show the Irish interest

in the Book. However, the real value of the

series for us is that it collects a hitherto un

related volume of case law into an accessible

and digestible form.

The printing and binding in these volumes

are of a high standard, and the Publishers are

consequently to be congratulated.

R. Pierse

The Law of Succession,

Anthony R. Mellows.

607 and (index) 24 pp.; paperback £3.

Dr. Mellows, who is an admitted solicitor, is

Director of Conveyancing Studies at King's

College, London. This book is made more

pertinent by the fact that it results from his

experience as a university teacher and as a

partner in a London firm of solicitors.

180