Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 532 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 532 Next Page
Page Background

108

JAN ONDŘEJ

CYIL 5 ȍ2014Ȏ

refers to Article 1 of the Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf

54

of 1958.

The Court stated that this article represented

customary international law,

55

even

though it used the term

the natural prolongation

, while in the Convention of 1958

the definition uses the formulation

submarine areas adjacent to the coast

.

The concept of

the natural prolongation of the land territory,

in the judgment on

Continental Shelf of 1969, however, was

not acceptable

for those states that

do not have

a seabed

as the

natural prolongation of the land territory

during the Third United Nations

Conference on the Law of the Sea. These states would like to exercise jurisdiction over

the seabed in the proximity of the shore and over the natural resources that can be

found there. These states argued a fixed limit for the continental shelf

56

should be

set. The states that already exercised jurisdiction on the basis of

natural prolongation

beyond the most likely limit of 200 nautical miles were against this. These states

included Great Britain, the USA, and the USSR, which possessed a continental shelf

beyond the 200 nautical miles limit and

were not willing

to renounce their claims to the

resources

57

in these more distant parts of their continental shelf. The dispute was

solved

by compromise

58

in Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982.

According to Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of

1982: „the continental shelf of a coastal State comprises the seabed and subsoil of

the submarine areas that extend beyond its territorial sea throughout the natural

prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin, or to

a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the

territorial sea is measured where the outer edge of the continental margin does not

extend up to that distance“. As Churchill and Lowe

59

state, this legal definition is

different from the geological definition. Parts of the sea that lie beyond the physical

continental shelf are included in the distance of 200 nautical miles from the shore.

This provision is today considered

customary international law.

60

Article 76, however, also defines the

outer edge of the continental shelf

, where the

continental margin

extends beyond the 200 nautical miles limit. According to Article 76,

paragraph 3 the

continental margin

comprises the submerged prolongation of the land

mass of the coastal state and consists of the

seabed and subsoil of the shelf, the slope and the

rise

. It does not include the deep ocean floor with its oceanic ridges or the subsoil thereof.

According to Article 76, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the continental shelf

of a coastal State shall not extend beyond the limits provided for in paragraphs 4

54

The text of the Convention is available in Czech as Úmluva vyhl. č. 114/1964 Sb. The Convention on

the Continental Shelf from 1958 defines the continental shelf as

“the seabed and subsoil of the submarine

areas adjacent to the coast but outside the area of the territorial sea, to a depth of 200m.”

55

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A. V.,

op. cit.

, p. 147.

56

Evans, M. D. (editor),

op. cit.

, p. 642.

57

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A. V.,

op. cit

., p. 148.

58

Evans, M., D. (editor),

op. cit.

, p. 642.

59

Churchill, R. R. and Lowe, A. V.,

op. cit.

, p. 148.

60

Ibid.