Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  127 / 532 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 532 Next Page
Page Background

111

WHAT IS THE LEGAL REGIME OF THE ARCTIC?

Ridge

. On 2 August 2007 a Russian mini-submarine placed a Russian flag on the seabed

under the North Pole as a symbolic support for the Russian claim which was submitted

to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in 2001. In the submission

of 2001 one of the central issues is a Russian claim to the underwater ridge lying under

the North Pole – the Lomonosov Ridge and Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge as extensions of the

Eurasian continent.

71

As mentioned above, the Commission neither refused nor accepted

the Russian submission but recommended further research. Russia hoped the newest

geological findings would lead the Commission to come to a different conclusion.

The possible delineation of the continental shelf in respect to the Lomonosov Ridge

and Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge depends on the interpretation of the terms

ridge

and

elevation

in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982. As Heidar

72

states, it is

not easy to distinguish between submarine elevations and submarine ridges, because the

Convention on the Law of the Sea does not contain their definition. Article 76 of the

Convention, however, contains three different terms. In Article 76, paragraph 3 there

is the term

oceanic ridge

. There is a negative definition which says that the continental

margin

does not include

the deep ocean floor with

its oceanic ridges

or the subsoil thereof.

The other term is

submarine ridge

. From Article 76, paragraph 6 of the Convention

follows that

submarine ridge

could, according to Benitah, be

included

73

in the

continental shelf. The outer limit of the continental shelf, however, does not exceed

350 nautical miles, from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. Heidar

74

has a different opinion, claiming that submarine ridge is

not a natural component of

the continental margin

.

The third term is

submarine elevation

, which is used in the second sentence of

Article 76, paragraph 6. According to this regulation, „this paragraph does not apply to

submarine elevations that are natural components of the continental margin, such as

its plateaux, rises, caps, banks and spurs“. Submarine elevation is a natural component

of the margin and can be of oceanic or continental origin. What is required, however,

is the natural prolongation,

i.e.

continuity of morphologic and geologic origin and

history of the rocks of the landmass of the dry land of the coastal state.

75

It is understood that for the submarine elevation the limitation

76

of 350 nautical

miles contained in the first sentence of this paragraph will not apply. Points on this

submarine elevation beyond the limit of 350 nautical miles

should be included into

the continental shelf

and the regulation about the 100 nautical miles beyond the

depth of 2500m should be used

77

. There is a possibility that the above mentioned

Russian claim is based on understanding the ridges as being

submarine elevation

71

Benitah, M.,

op. cit.

72

Heidar, T. H., The Legal Regime of the Arctic Ocean.

Zeitschrift fur auslandisches offentliches Recht und

Volkerrecht

, 2009, 69/3, p. 637.

73

Benitah. M.,

op. cit.

74

Heidar, T. H.,

op. cit., p. 638.

75

Ibid.

76

Benitah, M.,

op. cit.

A similar idea is presented by Wolfrum, R.,

op. cit.

, p. 538.

77

Ibid.