128
JAKUB HANDRLICA
CYIL 5 ȍ2014Ȏ
2. The Brussels Convention on Liability for Operators of Nuclear Ships:
key elements
The relevant provisions of the NS Convention were treated quite extensively by
contemporary authors of the time and the instrument was discussed at international
forums.
18
These sources remain, until now, the best reference to content and connotations
of treaty provisions, as the Convention ceased to be an object of interest in the 1970s
and 1980s, mainly because of reasons outlined below. Therefore, the aim of the
following paragraphs is to briefly point out the content of the main provisions, issues
of the Convention and their liability implication for nuclear-powered vessels.
The scope of application of the Convention
In comparison to earlier international treaties adopted at the previous Sessions
of the Diplomatic Conference on Maritime Law, the Convention was, at the time
of its adoption, considered to be remarkable.
19
This was first because it far surpassed
the area of private law and, second, because it involved both seafaring nations and
countries that had no prospect of operating important nuclear-powered fleets in the
near future.
Further, the Convention did not intend to cover conventional ships merely
transporting
nuclear material. That remained covered by the Paris Convention and by
the Vienna Convention, except to the extent that these treaties relied upon any prior
“international agreement in the field of transport.”
20
The restriction on the matters of civil liability
inter alia
implicates that the
Convention basically does not deal with the issues of nuclear safety, relying in
this matter on specialized nuclear safety treaties.
21
However, even the Convention
contains two requirements that might be considered as being of a safety nature:
– Article XV (1) stipulates, that
“Each Contracting State undertakes to take all measures
necessary to prevent a nuclear ship, flying its flag, from being operated without a license or
authority granted by it.”
– Article XV (4) stipulates, that
“Each Contracting State undertakes not to grant a license
or other authority to operate a nuclear ship flying the flag of another State.”
Furthermore, the Convention did not attempt to deal with perhaps the most
difficult problem of the whole complex of issues related to the use of nuclear energy
for the means of marine propulsion; the passage of nuclear-powered ships through
inland waters and their entry into ports. According to the Article XVII,
“nothing in this
Convention shall affect any right which a Contracting State may have under international
18
Op. cit.
sub note 7, at p. 304.
19
Op. cit.
sub note 10, at p. 778.
20
The Convention relating to Civil Liability in the Field of Maritime Carriage of Nuclear Material was
adopted in 1971. The purpose of the treaty was to ensure that the operator of a nuclear installation and
not the owner of a vessel will be exclusively liable for damage caused by a nuclear incident occurring in
the course of maritime carriage of nuclear material. The Convention came into force in 1975.
21
Berman, W., Hydeman, L
.
International Control of the Safety of Nuclear-Powered Merchant Ships,
Michigan Law Review,
1960, at pp. 233
et seq.