Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  145 / 532 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 145 / 532 Next Page
Page Background

129

THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION ON THE LIABILITY OF OPERATORS OF NUCLEAR SHIPS

law to deny access to its waters and harbors to nuclear ships licensed by another Contracting

State, even when it has formally complied with all the provisions of this Convention.”

Consequently, the Convention expressly presumed that special bilateral agreements

would be needed before nuclear-powered vessels would be able to enter foreign

waters. The assessment of safety standards were presumed to be subject to bilateral

negotiations between the licensing state and the state of the harbor. The participants

at the Conference adopted the NS Convention

inter alia

with the hope that a uniform

multilateral framework, created by this treaty, would make such negotiations easier.

22

The United States subsequently concluded a series of agreements related to the

NS

Savannah

(the

“Savannah agreements”

), which relied in matters of nuclear liability

on domestic law and, where applicable, on the “general principles of international

law”.

23

The Federal Republic of Germany concluded similar bilateral agreements in

relation to the NS Otto Hahn.

24

Another aspect of the scope of the Convention deserves very special mention,

because it has proven to be a major obstacle, preventing more than others the coming

into force of the convention. This is the inclusion of

nuclear-powered warships

under

the scope of the Convention. Being of a very special importance, this issue will be

discussed below in more detail.

Finally, the Convention (Article XIV)

25

provided that this treaty would supersede

any international agreements between parties in conflict with it. Among concerns,

international agreements touched by this provision at the time of adoption of the

NS Convention, the following were of major importance: the Brussels International

Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law with Respect to Collision

Between Vessels of 23 September, 1910, the Brussels International Convention for

the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to the Limitation of the Liability of Owners

of Sea-Going Vessels of 25 August 1924, the Brussels International Convention on

Certain Rules Concerning Civil Jurisdiction in Matters of Collision of 10 May 1952

and the Brussels International Convention Relating to the Limitation of the Liability

of Owners of Sea-Going Vessels of 10 October 1957.

26

22

Op. cit.

sub note 10, at p. 778.

23

A list of all these agreements as of 1 January 1968 was published in

Boulanger, W.

International

Conventions and Agreements on Nuclear Ships, In:

Nuclear Law for Developing World

, Vienna: IAEA

Legal Series. 1969, at pp. 179

et seq.

24

Articles 13-21 of the Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the

Netherlands on the Use of Dutch Waters and Harbours by the NS Otto Hahn of 28 October 1968

(Vertrag zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den Königreich der Niederlande über die

Benutzung niederländischen Hoheitsgewässer und Häfen durch N. S. Otto Hahn) refers to the

Convention for its liability provisions. An English translation of the treaty appears in E.N.E.A. Nuclear

Law Bulletin, No. 3, 1969.

25

“This Convention shall supersede any International Conventions in force or open for signature, ratification

or accession at the date on which this Convention is opened for signature, but only to the extent that such

Conventions would be in conflict with it; however, nothing in this Article shall affect the obligations of

Contracting States to non-Contracting States arising under such International Conventions.”

26

Op. cit.

sub note 10, at p. 778.