Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  293 / 532 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 293 / 532 Next Page
Page Background

277

ARE INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS BOUND BY INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS…

It is accepted in the literature

40

and State practice

41

that international legal

personality can be granted to international organisations explicitly or implicitly,

42

whereas the implicit way is far more the normal case. Nevertheless, there are two

unsettled issues: what are the aspects indicating the personality and what are its

consequences, i.e. does having international legal personality entail certain inherent

competences? The two schools of thought which have developed in the doctrine on

these questions are the “objective” theory and the “subjective” (“will”) theory.

43

Both

are based to a certain extent on the

Reparations for Injuries

Opinion of the ICJ, but

come to diverging results when assessing the above mentioned questions.

Most proponents of the subjective theory, to which the will of Member States

is the decisive element, do not consider any competences as being inherent. In their

opinion for determining the legal status and capacities of international organisations

only the will of the founding entities as expressed in the founding document is decisive.

Thus no capacities can be “inherent”, as they must result explicitly or implicitly from

the founding document. The objective theory regards legal personality as given when

certain objective criteria are fulfilled

44

and considers at least some of the capacities as

arising from the very personality

45

– irrespective of the will of the founders,

46

but still

somehow respecting possible functional and practical limitations.

47

40

KLABBERS, Jan.

Introduction to International Institutional Law

.

Supra

note 27, pp. 42

et seq.

;

ČEPELKA, Čestmír, ŠTURMA, Pavel.

Mezinárodní právo veřejné

. 1. ed. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2008,

pp. 78

et seq

.; MALENOVSKÝ, Jiří.

Mezinárodní právo veřejné: jeho obecná část a poměr k jiným právním

systémům, zvláště k právu českému

.

Supra

note 25, pp. 146

et seq

.; BROWNLIE, Ian.

Principles of Public

International Law

. Sixth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 648

et seq

.

41

It can be observed that continuously more and more international organisations are being granted

international legal personality explicitly. This applies for example to the EU (via changes introduced

by the Lisbon Treaty) or the ICC (Article 4(1) ICC Statute:

„The Court shall have international legal

personality“

); in this sense NAERT, Frederik.

International Law Aspects of the EU’s Security and Defence

Policy

.

Supra

note 37, pp. 284

et seq

.

42

Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations

, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 180;

SEIDL-HOHENVELDERN, Ignaz; LOIBL, Gerhard.

Das Recht der Internationalen Organisationen

einschliesslich der Supranationalen Gemeinschaften

.

Supra

note 25, para. 0307 and paras. 0324-0326.

43

Cf.

RAMA-MONTALDO,Manuel. International Legal Personality and Implied Powers of International

Organizations.

British Yearbook of International Law

. 1970, 44, pp. 111

et seq

.; SEYERSTED, Finn.

International Personality of Intergovernmental Organisations. Do Their Capacities Really Depend

upon Their Constitution?

Indian Journal of International Law

. 1965, vol. 4, pp. 1-75.

44

Basically these criteria are met when international organs are created which may assume their own

obligations.

Cf.

SEYERSTED, Finn. International Personality of Intergovernmental Organisations. Do

Their Capacities Really Depend upon Their Constitution?

Supra

note 44, p. 53.

45

RAMA-MONTALDO, Manuel. International Legal Personality and Implied Powers of International

Organizations.

Supra

note 44, pp. 111-155. Similarly, but somehow arguing in favour of inherent

capacities based on functional necessity, see BEKKER, Peter H.

The legal position of intergovernmental

organizations: a functional necessity analysis of their legal status and immunities

. Boston: M. Nijhoff,

1994, pp. 57-83.

46

SEYERSTED, Finn. International Personality of Intergovernmental Organisations. Do Their Capacities

Really Depend upon Their Constitution?

Supra

note 44, pp. 1-75; WHITE, Nigel D.

The law of

international organisations

. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996, esp. pp. 28-29.

47

WHITE, Nigel D.

The law of international organisations

.

Supra

note 47, pp. 52-53.