Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  197 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 197 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 4: Inherited Benefits: Advising Executors and Beneficiaries

197

nontaxable corporate reorganizations the IRS described as mere changes of form in Reg

. § 20.2032-1(c)(1) .

For another, the same individuals own the same securities in the same

proportions and in the same format (inherited IRA) both before and after the division. If

the taxable/nontaxable dichotomy is the bright line test, then this would be a “mere change

in form.”

However, when an inherited IRA is divided among multiple owners, the beneficiaries are

not required to take proportionate shares of each asset in the account; they may elect to take

different securities as part of their respective shares. For example, Beneficiary A might take the

stocks, B might take the bonds, and C might take the cash. This “swap” would not be an income-

taxable event, provided each beneficiary received the correct total value he was entitled to, because

all the assets are still inside the tax-deferred IRA account. However, if the beneficiaries did not

take proportionate shares of each and every security in the account, query whether they have

engaged in an “exchange” of inherited assets, triggering closing of the AVM period.

E.

Spouse’s election to treat account as spouse’s own account.

When the surviving spouse

is the sole beneficiary of the decedent’s IRA, the surviving spouse can elect to treat the

inherited IRA as her own IRA.

¶ 3.2.04 .

Following such election (which can occur by

default in some cases, without any overt act by the surviving spouse) the required minimum

distributions for the account are determined based on the surviving spouse as “owner”

rather than as “beneficiary.” The fact that this transformation is not a taxable event suggests

that the spousal election is a mere change of form that does not close the AVM period. On

the other hand, since the assets are no longer in the “decedent’s IRA,” they are now in the

“surviving spouse’s IRA,” they have arguably ceased to be “part of the gross estate,” which

would suggest the AVM period has closed.

F.

Distribution from the account.

IRA distributions that are reportable as such to the IRS

and recipient by the IRA provider on Form 1099-R are generally taxable (though a

particular distribution might not be taxable, for example, to the extent it represents return

of the participant’s “basis” in the IRA, or if it is “rolled over” within 60 days by the

surviving spouse as beneficiary, or if it is a qualified distribution from a Roth IRA).

Although any withdrawal from the IRA would be considered a “distribution” for income

tax purposes

( ¶ 2.1.01 )

, it would not necessarily be so considered for AVM purposes. Under the

regulations, only an executor or trustee can “distribute” property for AVM purposes. Reg.

§ 20.2032-1(c)(2) .

Accordingly, distributing assets out of an IRA within six months after the date of

death would not “freeze” the value of such assets for alternate valuation purposes unless either the

IRA is in the form of a trust under

§ 408(a)(8)

(

¶ 6.1.07

) or such distribution is considered an

“other disposition.”

Though property can be “distributed” for AVM purposes only by an executor or trustee,

“Property may be ‘sold, exchanged, or otherwise disposed of’ by” a much broader group of

recipients, including the executor, trustee, donee, heir, devisee, surviving joint tenant or “any other

person,” presumably including an IRA beneficiary. See Reg.

§ 20.2032-1(c)(3) .

When a security is distributed out of an IRA to the beneficiary, it is a mere change of the

form of ownership: The same individual beneficiary owns the same asset (the security inherited

from the decedent) both before and after the distribution. The asset now has changed income tax