![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0036.jpg)
GAZETTE
March 1976
as a maintenance application, or may request the
Master to transmit to the British authorities power to
take evidence. Alternately the Court can make a main-
tenance order which will be transmitted to Britain for
enforcement. It will be appreciated that there will be
unavoidable difficulties under these proceedings.
The Hon. Mr. Justice Liam Hamilton
delivered a
lecture on
"Recent Decisions relating to the Guardian-
ship of Infants Act 1964"
on Sunday morning. He first
of all quoted the text of Article 41 (relating to the
Family) and Article 42 (relating to Education) of the
Constitution. He recalled that the Guardianship of
Infants Act, 1886, and the Custody of Children Act,
1891, had been repealed by the 1964 Act. Following
the judgment of James Murnaghan J. delivering the
majority judgment of the Supreme Court in
Re Tilson
(1951) Í.R. 1 at p. 34—in which he stated that the
parents, father and mother, have a joint power and
duty in respect of the religious education of the chil-
dren. S. 6 (1) of the 1964 Act provides that "the father
and mother of an infant shall be guardians of the
infant jointly", thus shedding the old concept of pater-
nal power. If a deceased parent does not by deed or
will appoint a testamentary guardian of the infant(s)
the surviving parent will be the sole guardian of the
infant(s) unless a Court otherwise directs. If no guar-
dian has been appointed, or if a guardian refuses to
act, the Court may appoint one (S. 8). Unless the terms
of his appointment provide otherwise, every guardian
appointed shall be guardian of the estate as well as of
the person (S. 10). Upon application to the Court, every
guardian may apply for directions regarding custody or
right of access (S. 11). These applications are rare.
Part 3 of the Act deals with the enforcement of custody,
which is enforced exclusively by the High Court. If
a parent applies for production of its infant, if any
costs have been incurred by a Health Authority or by
another person in providing maintenance for such
infant, the parent will be directed to pay such costs.
If an infant has been abandoned or deserted, the Court
will not grant custody of the infant to the parent,
unless it is satisfied that such parent will be a fit and
proper person. The Court, if it is of opinion that a
relative will not follow the religion or ethics of the
parent may make an Order that such child will be
delivered to a person who has the legal right to ensure
that the proper religion will be taught. The principles
applicable may be stated t hu s:
1. Under S. 6 (1), irrespective of who is awarded cus-
tody of the infant, the father and mother shall
remain guardians of the infant. As Article 42 of the
Constitution states that "The State guarantees to
respect the inalienable right and duty of parents to
provide for the religious and moral, intellectual,
physical and social education of their children",
Section 3 of the Act defines as the paramount consid-
eration and welfare specifically the religious and
moral, intellectual, physical and social welfare of the
child.
2. Furthermore, the parent deprived of custody can
continue to exercise the rights of a guardian, and
must be consulted in all matters affecting the welfare
of his children. Dicta of Walsh J. in
Butler
v.
Butler
(Supreme Court, 24 April 1970, unreported) are
quoted in support of this proposition.
3. Any Order as to the custody or welfare of an Infant
under S. 11 is only interlocutory in character because
circumstances may change from time to time.
4. In normal circumstances, where a husband and wife
have parted, but are equally suitable to have custody
of children, the children of tender years will norm-
ally be left in the custody of the mother. As time
passes, the father is called upon increasingly with the
day to day problems of his son or daughter.
5. It is only if the mother is found greatly wanting in
her duty to her children, that the removal of very
young children from her custody would be warranted.
6. Insofar as the behaviour of the parents which con-
tributed to the breakdown of the marriage is relevant
to decide in whose custody the welfare of the child
would be best served, this would be relevant
evidence.
7. In considering the welfare of the infant, all the
ingredients specified in S. 3, namely the religious,
moral, intellectual, physical and social welfare of the
child must be considered globally. Dicta of Walsh J.
in
O
'Shea v.
O
'Shea (Supreme Court, 5 April 1974,
unreported) quoted in support.
8. The Order of the Court in respect of the custody of
the children is interlocutory only in character. Conse-
quently it is the duty of the parents to be concerned
about the welfare and education of their children.
9. On an appeal from a decision of the High Court, the
Supreme Court has power to hear further evidence.
The Court must not, however, be used as a forum in
which to air the grievances of one parent against the
other.
Mr. Justice Hamilton answered oral questions for
more than one hour after his lecture.
German Academic Exchange Service
T h e British Institute of International and Comparative
Law in conjunction with the London Branch of the
German Academic Exchange Service have arranged
the following International Summer Courses in Law for
1976, to be held at the London School of Economics and
Political Science.
International Summer Course in Modern English Law
5 July to 30 July 1976
Director of Studies : Professor Clive M. Schmitthoff,
(London)
Summer Course in Modern German Law
28 June to 9 July 1976
Director of Studies : Professor Hein Kotz, University
of Konstanz
International Summer Course in European Community
5 July to 16 July 1976
Director of Studies : Professor Kenneth R. Simmonds,
Queen Mary College, University of London, and
Director of the British Institute of Internatinoal
and Comparative Law
Summer Course in Advanced Modern German Law
5 July to 9 July 1976
Director of Studies : Professor Hein Kotz, University of
Konstanz
The language of all courses will be English.
As the number of places on all summer courses is
restricted, early application is recommended. Further
information and application forms can be obtained
from the Course Secretariat at the London Branch of
the German Academic Exchange Service, 11-15 Arling-
ton Street, London SW
36