![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0051.jpg)
GAZETTE
March
1976
EUROPEAN SECTION
The effect on Irish Law of recent
developments in European Community Law
affecting the Right of Establishment
This is a summary of a lecture which Mr. Bryan
McMahon, LL.M., Ph.D., Solicitor, delivered to the
21st Seminar of the Society of Young Solicitors in
Galway on 15th November, 1975. Dr. McMahon
emphasised that the essence of the theory upon which
the Community was founded is that free competition
between Member States will stimulate economic
activity within the Community as a whole, and will
therefore improve its economic position vis-a-vis the
rest of the world. In order to achieve this ultimate
state of free competition, all tarriffs and quotas
between Member States must be eliminated, currency
restrictions must be abolished, and restrictive prac-
tices and economic policies must be co-ordinated.
Equally important is the removal of restrictions on
movement of persons within the Community, and on
the right of nationals within the territory of other
Member States, which are considered essential
elements of the building of economic integration
within the Community.
Freedom of establishment comprises:—
(a) Freedom to engage in non-wage earning
activity,
(b) Free movement of workers, and
(c) Free supply of services.
The
Free Supply of Services
comprises giving expert
advice, providing entertainment, expanding tourism,
and transmitting films. Obviously these are not con-
tinuous activities.
The
Free Movement of Workers
covers activities
tor which a regular wage or salary is paid.
The category of
"non-wage earning persons"
com-
prises self-emplcyed persons, and proprietors of all
sorts of business and their partners, and includes
broadly all industrial, commercial and professional
activities. The idea of "establishment" presupposes
some permanence, but not necessarily of long dura-
tion. Generally speaking, such persons are allowed to
set themselves up, and to set up branches, agencies
or subsidiaries in the territory of any other Member
State; broadly speaking, no other formalities need be
observed but agreements will have to be reached on
the equivalence of professional and academic quali-
fications. In other words, foreigners are to be assimi-
lated to nationals in exercising non-wage earning
activities. Depending on whether a liberal or a re-
strictive trade participation policy predominates in a
particular country, the requirement for entry into the
J^tail trade need not be uniform throughout the
Community, but may vary from one country to the
n
ext. For instance if licences are required for a trade
activity by nationals, licences will also be required
b
y foreigners from other Member States. However, it
would not be legal for the Irish Government for
instance to impose such severe restrictions in regulat-
ing entry to trades that their own nationals would be
favoured, as it would conflict with Art. 54 (3) (a) of
the Treaty.
Exceptions are provided whereby there are areas in
the Member States in which integration is not yet
desirable. Generally the exceptions only reserve for
nationals those offices and trades which are funda-
mental to the safety of the State.
The first exception relates to Article 55—"Activities
within a State which include, even incidentally, the
exercise of public authority". This probably applies
to public offices, governmental positions at central or
local level and civil service posts, and clearly applies
to judges. It follows that in due course a German
would be permitted to become a solicitor in Ireland,
but could not subsequently be appointed a Judge.
The exception in Article 55 does not apply to State
monopolies, or to semi-State bodies, like Aer Lingus,
transport, or electricity. Most of these bodies are not
exclusive, and do not discriminate against public
enterprise.
The second exception relates to Article 56—Special
administrative or legislative provision for foreigners
shall be allowed if justified by reasons of public order,
public safety and public health. The Directive regulat-
ing this has been issued to harmonise its meaning. In
effect, it means that a Frenchman who wishes to
establish himself in Ireland cannot be refused per-
mission on temporary economic grounds such as high
unemployment, but he could be excluded on the
ground of being a spy or a dangerous criminal, or
having a highly contagious disease. A Council Direc-
tive of February, 1964, clearly stated that neither a
criminal record nor the expiration of an entry permit
were enough to entitle National Courts to deport
foreigners of other Members States.
The third exception relates to Article 223, which
permits Member States to exclude foreigners from
the production of, or trade in, arms, ammunition and
war materials. These industries are considered essen-
tial for the safety of the State.
The Implementation of the Right of Establishment
In Article 53, a wide prohibition against all new
restrictions was proclaimed. The direct and forceful
language of Art. 53, by which "Members States shall
not, subject to the provisions of the Treaty, introduce
any new restrictions on the establishment in their
territories, of nationals of other Members States", was
intended to be self-executory, and to apply directly
to the individual Member States without further
action by the Community. This is reinforced by various
decision of the European Court of Justice, such as
Van Gend
(1963) and
Da Costa
v.
EN EL
(1964).
It follows that a Belgian businessman who estab-
lished himself in Ireland, can invoke the protection
of the Irish Courts against discriminatory restrictions
as a result of the passing of the requisite constitutional
amendment, and of the European Communities Acts
of 1972 and 1973. A General Programme of Implemen-
tation under Articles 52-58 was prepared, which spells
out these Articles in greater detail, and created inter-
national obligations between the Member States. This
General Programme promulgated a timetable for the
progressive removal of restrictions in specific areas
by the end of the transitional period; this has already
been achieved to a certain extent. The General Pro-
gramme was to be implemented, as regards its more
detailed applications, by means of Directives These
Directives bind the Member States as to the goal to
be attained, while leaving the means by which they
51