Previous Page  227 / 328 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 227 / 328 Next Page
Page Background

UNDERTAKINGS TO PRODUCE

CERTIFICATES OF DISCHARGE FROM

SCHEDULES A AND B INCOME TAX

A solicitor who finds himself required to give,

on a closing of a sale, an undertaking to produce a

certificate of discharge from Schedules A and B

Income Tax under section 6 of the Finance Act,

1928, should, it is hardly necessary to say, satisfy

himself as to his ability to discharge his undertaking.

This involves satisfying himself as to his client's

liability for tax and if he is quite satisfied that the

client has no such liability or that it has been cleared

he can, with safety, give the undertaking in order to

close the sale. There are, however, certain hidden

dangers of which some members may not be aware

and one of these might best be illustrated by the

following example:—Supposing a client who is

selling his own dwellinghouse is in a salaried job

and the total of his income from his salary, which

would be assessable under Schedule D, added to the

total under Schedule A from the property of the

house is exceeded by his various personal allowances,

marriage allowances, etc. He is then in a position

of being liable to a " tax on charges ", that is to say,

he must when paying his ground rent deduct tax

at the full standard rate and account therefor to the

Revenue. He is, in effect, in the position of a collector

of taxes but is not, of course, paying any tax on his

own income. Suppose, also, that his tax position is

such that any small increase in his income would

bring him " over the line " and make him liable for

both Schedule D and Schedule A tax. The solicitor

on looking into his client's tax position, might feel

quite justified in giving an undertaking to the

solicitor acting for the purchaser of the premises to

produce a certificate of discharge from Schedule A

tax thereon as he would feel quite confident of being

able to secure such a certificate without any difficulty,

especially if his client had made returns over the

years and had not been found liable to tax. However,

if the client concealed from the solicitor, either

fraudulently or without any fraudulent intent, a

third source of income, say, from a small business

carried on as a sideline or an income accruing to

his wife and if this were to come to the notice of the

Revenue after the sale had been completed and the

undertaking given the solicitor could then find

himself in a serious position. The client would find

himself liable to Schedule D and, what is more

important from the point of view of the solicitor

giving the undertaking, Schedule A tax, and it could

go back a good number ofyears. The primary liability

to the purchaser in respect of the Schedule A tax would

then fall on the solicitor on foot of his undertaking

who would, in turn, have to look to his client.

SHARING PROFITS WITH

UNQUALIFIED PERSONS

A member recently answered a press advertisement

from a party who advertised that he was willing to

undertake legal work on a part time basis. Member

answered the advertisement and got in touch with the

advertiser and it transpired that he was an unqualified

law clerk. He stated to member that his terms for

carrying out the work would be one-quarter the

professional charges allowed for each of the items

actually done according to the scales in operation.

The member concerned asked the Council for their

opinion as to whether or not such a course would be

open to objection and the Council, on a report from

a committee, stated to member that he should not

enter upon the arrangement proposed.

The authority for this is regulation 7 of the

Professional Practice (Conduct and Disciplinary)

Regulations, 1955

(S.I. No. 151 of 1955) 1963

calendar page 135, in which it is provided that a

solicitor shall not agree to share with any un

qualified persons his profit costs in respect of any

business either contentious or non-contentious.

Certain limited and special situations are excepted

from this rule but the general rule is as stated

above.

Apart from the question of profit sharing with an

unqualified person the Council do not approve of

the employment of part time legal agencies for any

legal work except in the recognised field of searches

and costs drawing. A statement to that effect will

be found in the GAZETTE for October/November

1960, at page 54.

COUNTY CAVAN SOLICITORS'

ASSOCIATION

At the annual general meeting of the Association

on the yth May, 1963 the following committee was

elected:

Messrs. S.

J. Gannon, Killeshandra,

P. Cusack, Ballyjamesduff, P. N. Smith, Cavan,

T. C. Vance, Bailieborough, James Smith, Arva,

G. V. Maloney, Cavan, Senator T. J. Fitzpatrick,

Cavan and P. J. O'Reilly, Bailieborough.

Mr. James Smith was appointed President and

Mr. G. V. Maloney was appointed Secretary.

DECISION OF PROFESSIONAL

INTEREST

Irish citizen charged with alleged offences under an English

statute which does not apply in Ireland—warrant for

arrest issued in England

On the 6th December, 1960, the prosecutor was

taken into custody by a member of the Garda