move the adoption of the report of the Council for
the year 1962-63, and I do so with pleasure and
with confidence of your approval.
I have first to record, with deep regret, the deaths
of members of our Society which occurred during
the past year.
They are—George V. Moloney,
Cavan ; James L. McLoughlin, Dublin ; Henry P.
Mayne, Dublin;
John E. Wallace, Mullingar;
John Ryan, Dublin; Herbert McCloughlan, Donegal;
Robert I. Archer, Dublin; Francis P. Johnston,
Dundalk;
Samuel R.
C. Hemphill, Dublin;
Patrick J. Little, Dublin; Michael E. Fitzgerald ;
Thomas E. F. Bennett, Dalkey; Bernard Darcy,
Dublin ; Michael J. McGuire, Longford ; Arthur
C. Houlihan, Tipperary; Martin A. Salmon, Naas ;
Mrs. William L. Carroll, Castlebar;
James P.
Coffey, Louth; Commdt. Thomas M. McMahon,
solicitor, Advocate General with the United Nations
Organization who died in the Congo.
Amongst the names I have mentioned, you will
recall men who gave long service to the Society and
to our profession. Henry P. Mayne was a member
of the Council of this Society from 1926 to 1949 and
was a distinguished president for the year 1939-40.
May I, on my own behalf, and on behalf of my
fellow Council members, express to their relatives
and friends our sincere sympathy.
Finance
The accounts and balance sheet of the Society
have been in your hands for some time and show
the financial position of the Society for the year
ended 30th April, 1963.
Two years ago my distinguished predecessor,
Mr. Ralph Walker, issued a word of warning and,
having referred to a steadily decreasing profit,
accurately predicted that the day to day working of
the Society would entail considerable more expendi
ture, and this is reflected in the accounts before you
which show an
increase in expenditure under
various heads.
The Finance Committee of your Society make
each month a careful examination of the Society's
financial position, and a check on its outgoings.
There is, however, one item of expenditure over
which neither this committee nor the Council have
any control, namely the annual contribution which
your Society must make of £5 30 to the Incorporated
Council of Law Reportings. This is a service of
a public nature and we feel that its activities should
be financed out of public funds and not be a charge
on the finances of this Society.
Compensation Fund
The Compensation Fund set up by this Society
has given full indemnity to any person who suffered
loss through the dishonesty of a solicitor since the
passing of the Solicitors Act, 1954, and there is
a heavy burden on the members of our profession
in so far as each one of us is obliged to contribute
an annual sum of £20 towards this fund.
This
fund is administered by a committee of your Council
who make careful and painstaking investigation
into each claim which comes before them with
a view to seeing that full compensation is paid to
any member of the public unfortunate to suffer a
loss, but at the same time to safeguard the fund.
I think it right that the public should know that the
Society has power to refuse to make or to limit a
grant from
the compensation fund where
the
claimant has contributed to the loss by his own
negligence or conduct, or where he has employed
a solicitor who does not hold a practising certificate.
We are indeed indebted to the gentlemen on this
committee for their very important and necessary
work. When the yearly contribution of £20 from
each solicitor was fixed, you were informed that as
soon as it was warranted by the financial position
of the fund, steps would be taken to reduce the
contribution.
I am very glad to inform you that
your Council, with effect as from the 6th January
next, have decided to reduce the yearly contribution
from each solicitor from £20 to £15 whilst, at the
same time, they are able to maintain in the fund a
reserve in excess of the sum of £25,000 imposed by
the Solicitors (Amendment) Act of 1960.
I think
our profession will find this reduction most welcome,
not only from a financial aspect but as the tangible
proof of the firm belief of your Council in the
integrity of the vast majority of our members.
Solicitors'
Benevolent Association
I hope it is unnecessary to remind you that this is
the centenary year of the Solicitors' Benevolent
Association which is our own particular private and
personal charity and I appeal to every solicitor who
has not already done so, to join the Association to
become a subscriber thereto.
I had the privilege
of speaking at the Ninety-ninth Annual General
Meeting of the Association at the start of my
presidential year and I then said, and think I must
repeat, that a means test under Social Welfare
legislation creates a problem in that there
is no
use in an Association such as ours giving liberally
to some person by way of grant or annuity if this
was simply to reduce the amount of State assistance
that that person was then in receipt of.
I can
appreciate the difficulty in giving general exemption
in cases of this sort, but relief could be given in our
case as. the recipients come from a very special and
well defined ckss.
The directors of the Association have marked the




