Previous Page  171 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 171 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

Vol. 45

No. 3

July,

195 1

THE GAZETTE

of the

INCORPORATED LAW SOC IETY OF IRELAND

President

Vice-Presidents

Secretary

R

oger

G

reene

N

ia ll

S. G

affn ey

E

ric

A . P

lunkett

F

rancis

J . G

earty

FOR CIRCULATION AMONG MEMBERS

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL

J

uly

5TH. The President in the Chair.

Also

present: Messrs. Niall S. Gaffney, Francis J.

Gearty, Vice-Presidents, Sean O hUadhaigh, Joseph

Barrett, James R. Quirke, Daniel O’Connell, Dermot

P. Shaw, John R. Halpin, Thomas A. O’Reilly,

Reginald J. Nolan, Louis E. O’Dea, John J. Sheil,

Derrick M. Martin, James J. O’Connor, Joseph P.

Tyrrell, John J. Nash, Desmond Mayne, Desmond

R. Counahan, Arthur Cox.

The following was among the business

transacted:—

Solicitors Bill

A deputation consisting o f the President with

Messrs. O hUadhaigh and Cox was appointed to

approach the Minister for Justice to press for the

early introduction of the Bill.

Certificates o f discharge from Income Tax

and death duties

In the case of Hopkins

v.

Geoghegan (1931,

I.R. 135), on a vendor and purchaser summons,

Mr. Justice Johnston, in order to avoid expense

and delay, expressed the following opinion without

giving a formal decision. He held that the certificate

under Section 6 of the Finance Act 1928, if required

by the purchaser, is an expense which must be

borne by him under Section 3 (6) of the

Conveyancing Act, 1881, in the absence of a stipu­

lation to the contrary in the agreement for a sale.

The Council subsequently published a recommend­

ation, while not questioning the validity of the

obiter dictum

of Mr. Justice Johnston, that the

certificate in question should be furnished by a

solicitor acting for a vendor without additional

charge either against his client or against the pur­

chaser. A member acting for a vendor was required

to obtain and furnish two certificates of discharge

from death duties on the death of former owners

of the property and asked for the opinion of the

21