Previous Page  24 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 1. The

mechanical structure of

a hybrid stepping motor

Figure 2. PRO2 Servo motor from

Servotronix

Figure 3. Position feedback in a closed-loop, servo system

controlled motion application, the

control system assumes that the

motor is always moving correctly.

However, when a problem is

encountered, such as jammed part

that causes the motor to stall, the

controller does not know the actual

location of the machine, causing

it to lose position. The servo’s

inherent closed-loop system holds

an advantage: should the machine

snag on an object, it will be sensed

immediately. The machine will stop

operating and never lose position.

Speed and Torque

Performance differences between

steppers and servos derive from

their dissimilar motor designs.

Stepper motors have a lot more

poles than servo motors, thus one

complete rotation of a stepper

motor requires many more current

exchanges through the windings,

causing its torque to fall off

dramatically as speed increases.

Furthermore, steppers can lose

their step synchronization if the

maximum torque is exceeded. For

these reasons, servos are preferred

for most high-speed applications.

Conversely, the stepper’s high pole

count has a beneficial effect at lower

speeds giving the stepper motor a

torque advantage over the same

size servo motor.

Heat and Energy Consumption

Open-loop stepper motors operate

with constant current and give off a

significant amount of heat. Closed-

loop control avoids the heat problem

by supplying only the current that is

demanded by the velocity loop.

Summary of Steppers versus Servos

Servo control systems are best suited

to high-speed applications that

involve dynamic load changes like

robot arms. Stepper control systems

are preferred for applications that

require low-to-medium acceleration

and high holding torque such

as 3D printers, conveyors, and

accessory axes. Because they are

less expensive, steppers are favored

as they can lower the cost of

automation systems whenever they

can be used. Motion-control systems

that require the properties of servos

must justify the higher cost of these

motors.

ALTERING PERCEPTIONS

What if the advantages of closed-

loop servo technology could

be adapted to steppers? Could

we realize the cost benefits of

steppers while achieving servo-like

performance? By adopting closed-

loop technology, steppers are able

to deliver the combined benefits

of servos and steppers in a low-

cost stepper package. Because of

their significant performance and

energy-efficiency improvements,

closed-loop steppers can replace

more expensive servos in a growing

variety of demanding applications.

24 l New-Tech Magazine Europe