Previous Page  5 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

3

CONTENTS

Introduction

7

1 International Nuclear Liability Regime

11

1.1 The Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage

11

1.2 The 1997 Protocol to Amend the Vienna Convention

22

1.2.1 Background: “Nuclear Liability Labyrinth” in Europe

23

1.2.2 Authorisations Issued vis-á-vis the “Paris” Member States

26

1.2.3 Authorisations Issued vis-á-vis the “Vienna” Member States

31

1.3 The Brussels Convention on the Liability of Operators

of Nuclear Ships

35

1.3.1 Nuclear Marine Propulsion: Big Expectations

and the First Regulative Attempts

36

1.3.2 The Brussels Convention on Liability for Operators

of Nuclear Ships: Key Elements

41

1.3.3 Reasons for Deadlock

49

2 The European Nuclear Liability Regime

54

2.1 The European Atomic Energy Community and the Nuclear

Third Party Liability

54

2.1.1 Nuclear Liability “Labyrinth” Existing in the European Union

54

2.1.2 Nuclear Liability “Labyrinth” as Challenge for the European

Atomic Energy Community

55

2.2 Nuclear Liability Treaties vis-á-vis the Euratom

and Its Member States

57

2.2.1 Common Features of Existing International Nuclear

Liability Conventions

58

2.2.2 Differences in Nuclear Liability Regimes and

the “Renvoi” to National Legislations

58

2.2.3 Position of the Non-Contracting Member States

60

2.2.4 Preliminary Conclusions: A Need for Further Harmonisation

of the Nuclear Third Party Liability in the European Union

60

2.2.5 General Treaty Making Powers Laid Down in the Article 101

of the Euratom Treaty

60

2.2.6 Questioning the Euratom’s Powers in the Field of Nuclear

Liability

61