Previous Page  25 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 52 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 15, Number 3 2013

131

Clinical Insights

Keywords

Challenges

Maltreatment

Out of home

care

Speech

pathology

Strategies

This article

has been

peer-

reviewed

Nicole Byrne

(top) and Tania

Lyddiard

Challenges and practical strategies

for speech pathologists working

with children in out of home care

(OOHC)

Nicole Byrne and Tania Lyddiard

social interactions, poorer syntactic development, reduced

receptive and expressive vocabulary, delayed receptive

language development, delayed cognitive development

and delayed speech skills than other children (Allen &

Oliver,1982; Culp et al., 1991; Eigsti & Cicchetti, 2004;

Hwa-Froelich, 2012).

Some researchers consider it to be the early

impoverished environment rather than the length of time in

that environment that impacts most significantly on speech

and language development (Croft et al., 2007). However,

other researchers suggest children who enter into foster/

adoptive care at a later age take longer to catch up to

expected developmental milestones, indicating length

of time in impoverished environment does contribute to

outcomes (Glennen & Masters, 2002; Roberts et al., 2005).

Crucial time periods for removal from maltreatment have

been identified as 6 months after maltreatment onset for

maintaining an equivalent IQ (Castle et al., 1999) and 15

months for maintaining receptive and expressive language

skills (Windsor et al., 2011).

Children in out of home care are more likely to have

significant health needs, including speech, language

and hearing disorders (Hoff, 2003; Royal Australasian

College of Physicians, 2006). Australian researchers have

indicated that 45% of children under the age of 5 years

who have been maltreated had speech delay and 20% of

older children had language delay (Nathanson & Tzioumi,

2007) as compared to the general population rate of 12%

(children aged 5–18 years) (McLeod & Mckinnon, 2007) to

14.3% for children aged 5;4 to 6;10 years (Jessup, Ward,

Cahill & Keating, 2008). These results are supported by

Snow and Powell’s (2011) identification of young offenders

in jail who presented with a language impairment, and

had also had an OOHC placement, thus highlighting the

increased incidence of communication difficulties in children

in OOHC. Similarly, Golding, Williams and Leitão (2011)

found that 55% of foster carers had taken a child in their

care to a speech pathologist.

Aboriginal children are at a higher risk of communication

disorders due to cumulative factors such as being in OOHC

and having a higher incidence of otitis media than non-

Aboriginal children, which may result in hearing loss and

associated language delay (Couzos, Metcalf & Murray,

2001). In Australia, Aboriginal children are overrepresented

in OOHC. In 2011, the rate of Aboriginal children in OOHC

was 10 times higher than that of non-Aboriginal children

(AIHW, 2012).

This paper pertains to a specific vulnerable

group of children who have experienced

maltreatment and as a result, have been

removed from the care of their parents into

out of home care (OOHC). OOHC includes

both foster and kinship care. In this paper, the

challenges associated with working with

children in OOHC in a community-based

speech pathology service are identified. The

strategies that have been implemented within

OOHC are outlined in order to provide speech

pathologists working with children who have

been maltreated and their carers with

practical strategies to consider implementing

within their own setting.

M

any children within Australia, for various reasons,

are unable to live with their parents. Factors such

as poverty, level of parent education, family size,

parent mental health, substance abuse, housing/mobility

issues and parenting practices often contribute to increased

stress within households and may subsequently contribute

to child maltreatment (COAG, 2009; McIntosh & Phillips,

2002, Stone, 2007). The term child “maltreatment” is used

as the umbrella term to incorporate five maltreatment

subtypes: physical abuse, emotional maltreatment, neglect,

sexual abuse and witnessing family violence. Children who

have suffered maltreatment may be removed from the care

of their parents and placed into government-regulated out

of home care (OOHC). In Australia, from 2010 to 2011

there were over 40,466 substantiated child protection

notifications and 37,648 children placed in OOHC. This

suggests a high likelihood that children in care have

suffered from some form of maltreatment, most commonly

emotional abuse and neglect (AIHW, 2012).

There is strong evidence that a child’s maltreatment

impacts their development across many domains, including

language, cognitive, social-emotional and academic, and

that these difficulties may extend into the long-term (Hwa-

Froelich, 2012; Stone, 2007). A lack of stimulation, parental

support and interaction, and parental withdrawal has a

significant impact on a child’s receptive and expressive

language development. Research has indicated that

children who have been maltreated have less flexible

problem-solving abilities, poorer self-regulation, fewer