Previous Page  28 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

134

JCPSLP

Volume 15, Number 3 2013

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

Table 3. Challenges and strategies for the foster carer (FC)

Challenges

Strategies

FC does not typically have information on child’s:

Speech pathologist accesses information from centralised medical systems

• prenatal history (e.g., alcohol exposure)

• developmental milestones

Consent from caseworker or non-government organisation (NGO) representative as

• related early developmental factors (e.g., feeding problems)

“parent of the child” to engage with other health/education professionals

• family history of speech and learning disorders

• medical history (e.g., ear infections)

Presume child likely has recognised risk factors

• maltreatment

FC may not be privy to information regarding the

Phone call follow-up with caseworker to discuss maltreatment, to ensure accuracy

maltreatment of, and the potential impact on, the child

and appropriateness of sharing this information

FC may not have had links to early intervention or support

Referral to relevant service (e.g., Early Childhood Information Team) to assist families

services (e.g., carer support, playgroups)

to access services

FC may be unaware of length of placement

Ongoing liaison with caseworkers

FC may have difficulties working with child who has concurrent Liaison with OOHC SP coordinator regarding referral to appropriate services to access

behavioural issues, i.e., separation anxiety, trauma, aggression other allied health/multidisciplinary teams

Table 4. Challenges and strategies for the caseworker

Challenges

Strategies

Caseworkers are increasingly situated in NGOs

Educate speech pathologists on caseworkers’ roles

The clinical pathway identifies when there is a need to contact caseworker

Caseworkers may have varying exposure or knowledge

Incidental education of the caseworkers surrounding specific clients

regarding speech pathology

Provision of generic information on identification of speech/language delays and

referral mechanisms (Lyddiard, 2012b)

Caseworkers’ contact with FC may vary

Ensure contact details of caseworkers are current

Provide regular feedback on intervention (e.g., through the development of family

services/support plans)

Table 2. Challenges and strategies regarding the child

Challenges

Strategies

Child may have had a previous SP referral, but poor

Child is not to be disadvantaged based on previous failures to attend service under differing

attendance or follow-up while in the care of their

circumstances

parents may have led to their discharge

Hunter New England Local Health District Clinical Priority Tool is applied to all referrals;

children in OOHC typically have multiple risk factors placing them at a higher priority

(HNELHD, 2012)

Work with OOHC health case manager to provide assistance regarding active follow up

Child may not have had previous access to toys/

HNELHD play therapist provided a training workshop to SP team regarding the importance of

books/age-appropriate items, impacting upon

play, play stages and skills and relationships between play, interaction and communication

development of play skills

Speech pathologists work with childcare providers

Child may have difficulties with trust, building

Initial appointment is an opportunity to gain trust and build rapport with the foster carer (FC)

relationships and rapport

and the child, rather than a formal SP assessment

Education provided to SP team (e.g., attachment, managing complex behaviours)

Child’s speech and language ability on initial placement

Detailed discussions occur with FC about the child’s communication skills, including child’s

may be not representative of abilities once they have

length of time with that foster family, the problems they were experiencing in speech/

settled into their foster family and are in a stimulating

language when they entered into their care, any changes they have noticed (i.e.,

environment

improvements) since coming into care

Monitoring the child’s communication development may be the most appropriate

intervention.

Child may not respond well to new environments

Visits may be conducted in familiar environments (e.g., preschool)

and people

Families are encouraged to bring some of the child’s familiar toys/ books to the appointment

Where possible child maintains the same speech pathologist through intake, screening,

assessment and intervention

Provide a calm environment, introducing one activity at a time