Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  755 / 1542 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 755 / 1542 Next Page
Page Background

Higher DR

Dosimetric equipment (dose rate dependence?– P

ion

-k

q

-partial volume)

Radiobiology of HDR? No correction factor recommended

Main advantage FFF for

SRT (high fraction dose-small fields–

no modulation)

Motion management

– reduced treatment time (but interplay?)

Dosimetric characteristics

Clinical implications

Softer spectrum-low energies not removed

Lower effective energy if the electron beam is the same (shallower D

max

)

Higher skin dose

But purer spectrum (+ < e

-

contamination) and easier to model

Reduced variation of energy spectrum across field size (due to different hardening in

the field)

Reduced head scatter

Reduced treatment head leakage

Reduced variation of output ratio in air with field size

Lower out of field dose to surrounding tissues

(Kragl et al. Z Med Phys 2011;21)

Less neutron dose

(less photon fluence/dose and no neutron generated in the FF)

use of higher energy photons?