![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0118.png)
Standard Drives Buyers Guide
117
www.geindustrial.comPrices and data subject
to change without notice
Q: How are the EMC standards being created?
A:
The organization of EMC work within the IEC is presently
organized as follows:
Technical Committee No. 77 (TC77) is responsible for
basic standards having general application and for
generic standards
CISPR (the International Special Committee on Radio
Interference) is responsible for the protection of radio and
television broadcasting, but has extended its field of activity
to include information technology equipment (ITE)
Numerous product committees have the task of developing
standards specific to their products
To ensure coordination between these special committees
and the outside world, the Advisory Committee on
Electromagnetic Compatibility (ACEC) was set up to
coordinate the work and provide advice to the product
committees
The organization of EMC work within CENELEC is somewhat
simpler than that of the IEC:
Technical Committee 110 (TC110) is responsible for basic
standards, generic standards, and a certain degree of
supervision of the product standards
Various product committees in parallel with some, but not all,
IEC committees
Q: What is the difference between basic standards, generic
standards, and product specific standards for EMC?
A:
Basic EMC standards specify the general conditions or
rules necessary for achieving electromagnetic compatibility
applicable to all products and to which the product committees
may refer. The IEC 1000 series of standards are basic EMC stan-
dards. Generic EMC standards relate to a given environment and
are applicable to all equipment installed in the environment
where there is no product-specific EMC standard for that equip-
ment. Product-specific EMC standards specify the requirements
and tests specific to the products considered.
Q: Is it absolutely essential that all core drives with a final des-
tination in the EU comply with the EMC directive, even if they
are only used as components on machines built in the U.S. and
exported to Europe?
A:
Literally speaking, the EMC directive applies to “all electrical
and electronic appliances together with equipment and installa-
tions containing electrical and/or electronic components liable to
cause electromagnetic disturbance or the performance of which
is liable to be affected by such disturbance.” For the purposes of
the EMC directive, a “component” is defined as any item which is
used in the composition of an apparatus and which is not itself
an apparatus with an intrinsic function intended for the final con-
sumer. Therefore, from a legal point of view, compliance with the
EMC directive and affixation of the CE marking is only required
on the complete apparatus as opposed to each individual
component which make up the apparatus.
However, subsequent interpretations by EU officials have
declared that components that can be sold directly to final users
and are somewhat complex in nature (examples given are
motors, electronic circuit cards, and thermostats so obviously
drives would be included) are subject to the obligations laid down
in the EMC directive. Simple components (integrated circuits, low
voltage fuses, miniature resistors, etc.) and more complex compo-
nents which are intended for use by professional assemblers are
not subject to the provisions of the EMC directive. It is the respon-
sibility of the assembler to ensure that the end product housing
these components or subassemblies complies with the directive
requirements. Therefore, even though the CE marking indicating
compliance with the EMC directive is not legally required for
drives sold as components, it may very well be a market require-
ment for machinery OEMs who want to sell to the EU to avoid
possible issues with replacement parts, as well as to ensure them
the necessary documentation to help meet the EMC requirements
for their machines.
Keep in mind that starting in 1997, all low voltage equipment,
whether component or complete apparatus, must comply with
the low voltage directive and thus bear the CE marking. This is no
different than the U.S. situation where most components bear the
UL mark as well as the final product. There is no way to tell just
from the marking on the product itself which directives the
product meets (this is accomplished by the manufacturer’s
declaration of conformity).
Q: Is there anything positive for U.S. manufacturers in all
of this?
A:
Looked at one way, the CE marking and all of the directives
could be thought of as a major trade barrier which EU members
have erected to make it difficult for those outside to get their
products in. And although there are elements of some of the
directives which appear that way, overall this is certainly not the
case. In fact, the EU member nations have had to knock down a
number of their own trade barriers to create this vast mega-mar-
ket whose size exceeds that of the U.S. One example is the myri-
ad of national marks that used to be legally required to enter
some of the countries. In the game of international trade,
the U.S. has suffered from the disadvantage that our foreign
competitors could develop one product with one mark and sell it
into the largest homogeneous market in the world. Now the rest
of the world has the same advantage with the EU. There may still
be market requirements in some countries for national marks
such as VDE or BSI, but legally the product cannot be restricted.
U.S. manufacturers should view the new system as a great
opportunity for global growth.
Industry White Papers
Europe and the CE Marking: Questions and Answers