Previous Page  14 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Justice Matters

|

14

|

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

have to be for school or even academic in nature, it can also

be used to gain life-related information. By forcing a student

who already has an aversion to school or school literacies to

read only academic texts, teachers are essentially creating a

struggling reader (Alvermann, 2001) instead of helping one.

What to do: Practices to

Accommodate All Dialects

Discard the Deficit View.

It was once thought that

standardization, particularly language standardization, was the

‘fix’for diverse students and an attempt to bring all students to the

same learning level. However, now the norm is diversity (Genishi &

Dyson, 2009), which implies a need to embrace all students’cultural

and linguistic practices. Teachers should not assume that there is

something wrong with a student when their dialect is not what

is considered SE (Fillmore & Snow, 2000). Non-standard dialects

should not be viewed as a deficit of a student; rather, they should

be celebrated and considered part of a student’s personality.

It is the job of teachers to understand the ways their students

communicate and accommodate their dialects in the classroom

without correcting, or worse, shaming them. Ladson-Billings (2016)

reminds us that all students have different upbringings, so teachers

should alter their teaching to best accommodate these students.

Allow Students to Construct Identity Through Their Language

Use.

It is clear that language and power are closely related. In

fact,“non-standard language practices [could be] associated

with ‘bad’morals and a myth arises [that] bad language signifies

bad people”(Brady, 2015, pp. 150-151). However, for teachers to

put a ban on non-standard dialect use in the classroomwould

be infringing upon a student’s freedom and prohibiting them

from establishing a group and cultural identity (Brady, 2015). It

is imperative to allow opportunities for NSD students to explore

their identities through their use of language and dialect.

Introduce Code-Switching to NSD Students.

Oftentimes, the

dialects students bring from home are extremely different than the

SE used at school (Fillmore & Snow, 2000). It is often misconceived

that only SE could be used in the classroom; however, the language

practices students bring from home can be used in a variety of

ways in the classroom. Code-switching refers to switching from

one language (or dialect) to another - depending on the situation.

This could be an extremely valuable tool for NSD students so they

can still keep their dialectal/cultural identity. Teachers should

encourage NSD students to use their own dialect during informal,

social conversations in the classroom, but provide themwith

standard codes for the writing and speaking that is expected in

academia and in the workplace. Additionally, allowing NSD use in

the classroomwill help students feel more comfortable through oral

expression, further encouraging participation and engagement.

Communicating to students that even though the language that

is expected in formal environments may not match their familiar/

cultural dialect, they are not ‘wrong’for using their dialects in social/

informal settings such as group work or discussions is critical to

developing inclusive classrooms. This practice lets NSD students

know that their dialects are valid and can be valued in the classroom.

Practice a Culturally Responsive Teaching Pedagogy.

This

theoretical practice embraces the idea that social justice and equity

should exist among all students in the classroom and should be

practiced by teachers. This means“providing a way for students to

maintain their cultural integrity while still being able to succeed

academically”(Ladson-Billings, 1995, p. 476). One way to do this is

to invite a student’s funds of knowledge

into the classroom content

through their dialect usage. It has already been stated that students

and teachers bring their own, often differing, cultural beliefs and

values to the classroom. Oftentimes, teachers simply overlook

the differences between themselves and their students. However,

instead of being ‘color-blind’to the differing cultural beliefs and

values of students, culturally responsive teachers celebrate and

accommodate the cultural values and beliefs of all students.

Balancing a classroom that has the requirement of standard

English with non-standard dialect students is often a challenge

many educators face. Brady (2015) recommends the use of

transformative practices that utilize a collaborative relationship

among the teacher and students. Through this collaboration, both

teacher and students are able to work together to achieve the

common goal of social justice and acceptance of all students in

the classroom. Collaborative practices may include: student-led

instruction, project-based activities within groups, and a focus on

the student’s diverse communities or funds of knowledge that

they bring to the classroom (Brady, 2015). These transformative

practices embody the culturally relevant pedagogy and may

empower the dialectal diversity students bring to the classroom.

Improve the Student/Teacher Relationship.

All students

are entitled to a quality education regardless of background,

ethnicity, beliefs or socioeconomic status (Anyon, 2014). With this

in mind, it is usually minority students who are left behind in their

education (Anyon, 2014). The reasons these students fall behind

are endless, but if they do not feel an authentic connection to the

classroom through a solid student/teacher relationship, then there

is no motivation to continue learning. A strong student/teacher

relationship, increases the motivation of students, especially minority

students (Delpit, 2006). This promotes feelings of acceptance and

emotional closeness; which ultimately influences the motivation

of student’s academic achievement level. One way to improve the

student/teacher relationship is to allow students the opportunity

to express themselves in their own preferred method and medium

in order to show true ownership of their language development

(Ushioda, 2011). This includes allowing NSD students to use the

language or dialect they feel most comfortable with in the classroom

freely without judgment. A close student/teacher relationship

allows all students to feel more accepted in the classroom

community and gives themmore opportunities to succeed.

Improving Literacy Practices with

Minority Students

Students need to see themselves through their reading.

Connecting students to what they read in the classroom would

benefit those students who have an aversion to reading. Culture

influences a reader’s identity (Alvermann, 2001), so teachers should

draw upon the identities of their students while identifying books