Previous Page  26 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

CONSTRUCTION WORLD

MARCH

2017

24

PROJECTS & CONTRACTS

People must live and work somewhere.

Given ructions in the world economy,

evidence shows that more people believe

their best bet for a better life is in cities. This

is especially true in developing countries.

And they’re right. According to the UN

Habitat, urban areas generate 70%

of global GDP.

With people sold on the idea of cities,

where are they going to go? Existing cities

have developed for good reason, but always

piecemeal, forever behind the rising curve

of practical need. Demand outstrips supply

many times over.

Cities can expand upwards or

downwards, but this is a finite solution.

More often, cities sprawl sideways,

the centres de-densifying in favour of

suburbanisation.

Inhabitants often discover that, at the

periphery, there is no public transport,

forcing them into cars which worsens

congestion, pollutes the air and ups the

per capita carbon footprint. Life becomes

stressful, with residents more prone to

ill-health. New arrivals intent on bettering

their lot face problems. Native inhabitants

intent on protecting their advantages face

problems. And no one is consulted about

the change.

Is better urban governance part of the

solution? City leaders do organise, driven by

a worthy ambition to provide shelter for all

citizens. However, they suffer the same fate

as the city’s infrastructure. They are unable

to keep up with the real issues.

The American academic Benjamin

Barber, author of

If Mayors Ruled the World

, is

optimistic. He sees city governance as the

model for a post-national, interdependent

political landscape. In his words, “The

road to global democracy runs through

cities”. It’s already happening. Mayors are

meeting the challenges pragmatically and,

by virtue of their semi-autonomous power

base, are able to share these lessons with

other mayors below-the-radar of national

governments. By splicing out their city’s

good genes, they can be recombined

elsewhere to beneficial effect.

South African urbanist Edgar Pieterse,

though, is not so sanguine. City leaders

are not adequately representative or

responsive. He argues for the reinvigoration

of civil society to include the everyday

concerns of marginalised people, especially

of cities in the developing world.

Alessandra Orofino, based in Rio de

Janeiro, has the tools to enable that

engagement. She’s the compelling force

behind Meu Rio, a digital platform for grass

roots civic participation. Her tools are being

used to air local grievances, rally support

and change policy in Rio. Her battle cry is,

“It’s our city: let’s fix it”.

These efforts tackle symptoms. They

do not reconcile clashes between old

infrastructure and new technologies, or

between native and newly arrived citizens.

Is there a more radical solution? Is there

a circuit-breaker to halt the downward

development spiral?

Paul Romer, an American economist,

thinks there is. In his view, attempting to

expand existing cities is doomed, especially

in developing countries. Instead, he thinks

we should build new charter cities. Charter

cities – cities that operate to their own set

of special rules – have the unique quality of

allowing experimentation by recombining

good urban genes imported from more

economically mature corners of the globe.

Modelled in part on Shenzhen in

Southern China, his idea is that these

experiments must be brand new, with the

rules drawn up beforehand by the host

country. That way, investors, companies,

workers, and families actively opt-in to

migrating there in preference to other cities.

The infrastructure and public services

are planned for 21

st

century conditions.

Opportunity for citizens is equal. And if the

experiment works, the rules can be adopted

across the country.

Of course, success is in the detail.

Setting rules that reform poor governance

is a tall order. But by matching the common

experience to expert knowledge, and

integrating our findings with tech and good

governance, perhaps we can walk the extra

mile in citizens’ shoes – so that they

don’t have to.

*This is from Aurecon’s futuristic blog,

Just Imagine.

Traffic against Shanghai cityscape. Shanghai

is the largest Chinese city by population and

the largest city proper by population in the

world with over two million vehicles.

OUR CITIES ARE FULL

– we need new ones

By Matt Coetzee

By 2050, the UN predicts that cities will somehow accommodate a

massive 2,5 billion more people than the 4 billion that already live

there. The big question is, where are they all going to go? How do

we make sure these places are fit for the continued influx of people?

By walking a mile in their citizens’ shoes, could we simply replace

imperfect cities with improved ones?